Home > 2014 > Auto Loans

The Real Reason Your Car Dealer Wants to Lend You Money

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

In response to what it sees as a troubling trend of auto-lending discrimination at banks, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is proposing to oversee the business practices of nonbank consumer auto lenders – including automakers’ financing units — in the same manner that it does the nation’s banks.

Reactions have been swift and searing.

The National Automobile Dealers Association publicized a plea for the bureau to accept the industry’s revised approach to preventing predatory lending practices in place of the bureau’s proposed course of action.

Congressional supporters have also weighed in with their strong views, some because their interests are aligned with the auto and finance industries. Others, I suppose, have joined the argument because this new conflict serves as a proxy for the ongoing debate about the CFPB itself, which they’ve opposed from the get-go.

The Business of Auto Financing

At roughly $900 billion, auto financing is the third largest form of consumer debt in the U.S. Without it, vehicle sales would grind to a halt because at just under $30,000 per unit, the average price of a new car is beyond the ability of most consumers to fund with cash-on-hand.

Buying on time has become an economic way of life for budget-conscious households. It’s been a godsend for sellers, too, not least because instead of having to defend against an objection to price, marketers of big-ticket items are able to sidestep the problem by pitching the comparative affordability of a monthly payment plan. But even that’s not their only reason for offering credit as an option.

Sellers of durable goods (items that have a long life-cycle and are bought infrequently, like household appliances or cars) often manage three areas of profitability for every sale they make: from the product itself, the service it’s likely to require over time and via the financing their customers typically require. At issue, however, is the interplay between these three profit margins—in particular, the extent to which a seemingly cut-rate car price is being subsidized by an unfairly priced financing arrangement—that is attracting the CFPB’s scrutiny. Here’s how that can happen.

Suppose a car dealer sets its target at a 10% profit margin for every sale it makes. Also suppose that it’s only able to squeeze out $1,500 worth of profit from the $25,000 sale it’s about to close. Since the profit target for that sale is $2,500, the $1,000 shortfall would have to be made up some other way: through the dealership’s service department or by a financing deal.

After-market service is a crapshoot, though. Who’s to say that the buyer will follow the recommended maintenance schedule, let alone have that work done at the dealer’s shop? Financing is, by contrast, a much surer bet given that more than 80% of all auto sales are made possible with OPM (other people’s money). The key, however, is to find a way to inflate the financing deal by an additional $1,000.

Fortunately, the banks have been quite accommodating in this regard.

The financial institutions that fund these deals typically quote “buy rates” or “base rates” to their car dealer and nonbank cohorts, which they permit to be marked up as they see fit.

So continuing with our $25,000-purchase example, suppose the customer consents to a $5,000 down payment—which would be typical for a loan of this type—and requires a five-year repayment term for the $20,000 balance. Let’s also suppose that the bank has set a 5% buy rate for the deal.

Since the dealership wants to earn an additional $1,000 from the sale, and since that sum represents 5% of the value of the prospective loan, the dealer would then divide that 5% by the so-called half-life of the financing term—2.5 years, in this instance—and add the resultant 2% to the base rate. Consequently, the customer would be charged 7% for his loan rather than the 5% rate the bank has approved.

Incidentally, the longer the term, the lower the interest rate mark-up: If the aforementioned example were for a three-year loan instead of five, the mark-up works out to be 3.33% instead of 2%. Also note that all this math works in reverse when car dealer and manufacturers want to kick-start sales with offers of seemingly below-market-rate financing.

How Consumers Can Comparison-Shop

Clearly, the temptation exists to make even more money by way of this pecuniary prestidigitation—and that goes to the heart of the CFPB’s concern, particularly since its investigations have shown that those who can least afford the cost of borrowing are charged the most. But though the bureau has successfully enforced regulatory compliance and extracted tens of millions of dollars’ worth of fines in the process, the financial-services industry has thus far adamantly refused to curtail its long-standing policy of permitting intermediaries to mark up base rates.

So while this regulatory contest of wills presses forward, what can consumers do to ensure that the deals they make are fairly priced? By separating the profit centers and testing the pricing for each.

As important as financing is for big-ticket purchases, a good strategy would be to negotiate the sale price of the item as if you were paying cash for it. That way, you’ll be able to compare the quote you receive with the price that sites such as Consumerreports.org suggest you should be willing to pay for the car you have in mind.

Then test the dealer’s financing offer by comparing that with the local alternatives you can find online. Be sure to take both rates and fees into consideration when you compare costs.

For example, the APR for a five-year loan for $20,000 that charges 5% interest plus a $250 documentation fee is actually 5.51%. Efunda.com has an especially easy-to-use online calculator that can help you with the math—not only for car loans, but also for any other type of financing where interest rates and fees are individually quoted.

One more thing: Consumers can certainly benefit from knowing ahead of time what condition their credit is in — their credit score will, to a large extent, inform what kind of interest rate they can expect when they borrow money. They can see their credit reports for free through AnnualCreditReport.com, and can get their credit scores for free through Credit.com.

More on Auto Loans:

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

Image: kzenon

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • marveleazer

    While this is certainly an entertaining piece and great Monday morning water cooler fodder, it is by no means representative of auto finance dealings. I’ve spent a career in finance from the dealer side and the numbers you’re referencing are way out of line. If dealer originated financing were so egregious then customers would avoid us like the plague. Truth is more than two thirds of consumers allow dealers to handle their financing. Either the general buying public doesn’t read or there must be a case to support financial and service products being offered by automobile dealers.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team