Home > Students > Sen. Elizabeth Warren: The Vote That Could Cut Your Student Loan Bills

Comments 1 Comment

Student loan debt is exploding. It has grown so much and so fast that it not only crushes millions of young people, but it also has started to weigh down our entire economy. Total nationwide student debt now stands at $1.2 trillion, more than the total credit card debt owed by everyone in America.

In the coming days, the Senate will vote on the Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act, which would help ease this debt burden for millions of borrowers by cutting the interest rates on existing student loans. Earlier this summer, a large majority – 58 senators, including every Democrat, every Independent and three Republicans – were ready to take up the bill, but Republicans filibustered it, refusing to even debate the legislation. We may have lost that vote, but we’re not ready to give up. More than 750,000 people have signed petitions in support of student loan refinancing, and momentum continues to grow.

Every Democrat, every Independent, and even three Republicans were willing to advance the Bank on Students Act because they recognized that we are facing a crisis. Federal agencies like the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are already sounding the alarm. Student debt is keeping borrowers from buying homes, moving out on their own, buying cars and opening small businesses. It’s keeping them from making the purchases that will help our economy grow.

[How Student Loans Can Impact Your Credit]

With interest rates near historic lows, homeowners, businesses and even local governments have refinanced their debts. But a graduate who took out an unsubsidized loan before July 1 of last year is locked into an interest rate of nearly 7%. Older loans run 8-9% and even higher. These higher interest rates are producing billions of dollars in profits for the government. According to the Government Accountability Office, just one slice of the loans – those from 2007 to 2012 – will produce $66 billion in profits.

Our bill lowers the rate to 3.86% for undergraduate loans and a little higher for graduate and parent loans. These new rates are exactly the rates nearly every Republican in the House and the Senate voted for just last year as the fair rate for new student loans issued in the 2013-2014 school year. If these lower rates are good enough for new borrowers, they should be good enough for the older borrowers, too.

Instead of running up the deficit, we propose to offset the lost profits from the higher student loans rates. By stitching up a loophole in our tax code that allows some millionaires to pay a lower tax rate than middle-class families, we can reduce loan rates for our kids and make sure that the wealthiest among us pay their fair share. In fact, closing these loopholes will fully cover the cost of refinancing student loans and will reduce the federal deficit by about $14 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

[A Credit Guide for College Graduates]

This legislation doesn’t solve every problem that we have in higher education. We need to bring down the cost of college, and we need more accountability for how schools spend federal dollars. But the need for more reforms shouldn’t stop us from doing what we can to help the 40 million Americans with existing student loan debt right now.

This is a question of economics, but it is also a question of values. Should we continue to support millionaires and billionaires, carefully protecting the loopholes that let people earning more than a million dollars a year pay tax rates lower than middle class families? Or do we spend the same money to support young people who borrowed money to go to school?

[17 Million Reasons to Raise the Minimum Wage]

Republicans so far have blocked the Bank on Students Act, choosing to side with billionaires instead of with students. But we’re not backing down on this issue. This bill can pass if the Republicans would drop their filibuster – and if they continue their obstruction, we’re still just two votes away from breaking that filibuster.

The billionaires may have an army of lobbyists to protect their perks, but we have our voices and our votes. We’re going to keep fighting to level the playing field for students, strengthen our economy, and give everyone a fair shot at building a future – keep fighting until we make it happen.

Read Rep. Virginia Foxx’s op/ed on the student loan bill hitting the Senate floor this week.

More on Student Loans:

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Jimmie Bratton

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren we students do not need refinancing. We need to have all students loans discharged in bankruptcy, refinancing is not the way. Will you please stop it???? JIMMIE

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team