Home > Identity Theft > The Next Massive Security Flaw You Should Worry About: Bash

Comments 0 Comments

Yes, you should be very concerned about Shellshock, the latest software bug to arise with the potential to degrade the overall safety of the Internet by several notches.

Shellshock, also referred to as Bash, is a glaring weakness in an otherwise innocuous bit of coding that’s been around since 1987. Bash, shorthand for Bourne Again Shell, is a program that allows you to type commands on computing devices that use the Unix, Linux, Apple Mac and Android operating systems. You’ve encountered  Bash if you’ve ever typed text commands on the black screen sitting behind the graphical interface of your computing device.

The existence of the Shellshock flaw was made public last week, riveting the attention of the global security community. It’s almost certain elite hacking groups have been aware of the vulnerability for some time, and have been taking advantage.

And now the rest of the cyber underground can make hay. The mad scramble is on. Much as they did earlier this year upon disclosure of the Heartbleed bug, companies of all sizes must identify and patch systems exposed to the Shellshock flaw.

“It’s at least equal to Heartbleed for sure,” says Garve Hays, software architect at NetIQ. “Heartbleed was ephemeral, you could gather personal data and move on. But with Shellshock, you can plant a backdoor on a server and stay there for years. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.”

Apache Servers Targeted

White hat researchers have begun probes to find vulnerable systems. The biggest, most obvious targets are Apache web servers. These Linux-based machines are used to run about one-third of the websites on the Internet.

“System administrators will be working long shifts to go through every single server, router and other piece of equipment that uses the Bash shell,” says Jerome Segura, senior security researcher at Malwarebytes Labs.

Big enterprises have the resources and motivation to expedite patching. But hundreds of thousands of small and medium sized businesses will be slow to patch, or never patch at all. In the meantime, every hacker from script kiddies to spammers to account hijackers can now do simple reconnaissance to find and infect unpatched Apache web servers and related networking equipment.

“It’s a race against time,” Segura says. “The bad guys are hard at work trying to hack into affected systems.”

That’s just the first wave. Another obvious target that hacking gangs surely will triangulate are the routers used in home networks and small businesses. Up until about two years ago, Bash was widely used in Linksys, Belkin and many other brands of consumer-grade routers, says NetIQ’s Hays.

Home Routers Ripe for Attack

So if you’re using an older router in a home or small business setting, you should assume the bad guys will soon turn their attention toward seeking out your unpatched router and taking control of it — because it’s simple and profitable to do so.

Bash also comes into play on certain Apple Macs, and certain older versions of Android handsets. Apple issued a statement saying the majority of Mac OSX users are safe from Bash exploits.

Even so, it will take some time to determine the full extent of the ramifications of this flaw, says Dr. Mike Lloyd, CTO of RedSeal Networks.

“It’s relatively easy to tell whether the flaw is present, but it’s hard to tell if it’s reachable,” Lloyd says. “The maze of software and configuration interactions is too complicated for a human analyst to be able to say categorically ‘the cheese is exposed, or is not exposed, to the rat.’”

So what can individuals and companies do? Pay close heed to patches and get them installed. Tools are readily available to check whether your network is using a vulnerable version of Bash, says Jeff Schilling, CSO at FireHost.

Advised Schilling: “Step one is to figure out if you have any systems that are vulnerable. If so, how many? Step two is to figure out how to put a compensating control in place to buy time to wait for a patch. Step three, patch your systems in a methodical manner to ensure your most important servers are fixed first.”

More on Identity Theft:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team