Home > Managing Debt > Is This Legal? 40% of My Paycheck Is Being Garnished

Comments 2 Comments

Jennifer’s paystub is downright depressing. It’s bad enough that she earns less than $11 an hour as a single mom in Wisconsin. Her gross pay of roughly $800 every two weeks would challenge anyone trying to run a household, but that’s not the half of it. Jennifer is one of millions of Americans facing wage garnishments for unpaid debts — in her case, a student loan used to pay for online classes. She’s also garnished for child support, a double-whammy. By the time her taxes are deducted, just $410 ends up in her checking account.

If that doesn’t sound right to you, it shouldn’t: The student loan garnishment eats up 15% of her after-tax pay, while the child support takes an additional 25%. That exceeds the garnishment caps established by federal law and Wisconsin state law. But garnishment procedures generally require employees to file an appeal in such circumstances, and Jennifer had no idea how to do that when she reached out to me after reading a story in the Credit.com Debt Collection Files.

Jennifer asked that her identity be masked to avoid any conflict with her employer (“It may not be much of a job but it’s what I got.”) She sent me a copy of her paystub to confirm the details of the garnishments.

“I work a full time job, 40 plus hours a week in a call center…and can barely survive with what I am left with,” Jennifer said.

Wage Garnishment in America

An astonishing 1 in 14 U.S. workers face wage garnishment from their regular paychecks, according to a recent study published by payroll processing firm ADP. Nearly half of them are paying court-mandated child support, but almost as many — roughly 3 million Americans — are facing automatic paycheck deductions to pay back student loans or other kinds of debt, the report found.

In other words, America’s employers have become a de facto army of debt collectors.

Employers aren’t happy about it. Garnishments can create unnecessary ill will with employees, and they can also create unexpected liability. The maze of state and federal law governing garnishments can be hard to follow.

But if it’s rough on payroll professionals, it can be much rougher on consumers. Jennifer tried objecting to her employer this summer, the first time her paycheck was cut nearly in half, complaining that the cut placed her below the income floor which allows one of the few garnishment exemptions.

“I was told that it didn’t matter once it was applied,” she said.

It’s unclear that she would have qualified for the federal exemption anyway — a worker earning more than $290 per week ($7.25, the minimum wage, times 40) enjoys no federal exemption.

Unraveling the Confusion

Wisconsin state law offers additional protections over and above the federal law. The law makes clear that a second garnishment order cannot be enforced if a worker is already facing 25% garnishment for child support. Jennifer knew that, but had no idea how to stop the money from flying out of her paycheck. When she complained to her employer and the U.S. Department of Education, both sides blamed each other.

“Neither will take fault therefore neither want to be the one to fix it. From my understanding, it was up to my payroll department to deny the garnishment as I was already over the (cap) but they put it through anyways,” she said.

The $101 deducted from her paycheck for overdue student loans is levied by the U.S. Department of Education for a Stafford Loan Jennifer received to attend Globe University, a for-profit online school where she had been working towards a college degree in criminal justice. Together with a second loan she received directly from Globe, she owes the school $23,000 currently, and cannot complete her degree until she repays the money.

“The stress of everything over the last few months actually had me physically ill. I dropped 30 lbs. in three months,” she said. “I haven’t even checked my mail in a good three weeks because I don’t want to know what is in there.”

She’s been paying child support for two years to help with expenses for kids from a prior marriage – she has two other kids at home now – and says she has no problem with that garnishment. The second deduction, which took effect earlier this year, was the real kick in the teeth.

“I have wanted to (appeal) because I am in danger of losing my home because of this but I really don’t understand how. They seem to make it complicated to do. It’s been going on for months so I have no idea where my paperwork went,” she said.

Who Can Help?

When garnishments are served on workers, the form for filing an appeal is supposed to be included with the rest of the paperwork. Time is of the essence — it’s much harder to stop a garnishment once it has started. Jennifer doesn’t recall if the form was included with her order.

For advice on what Jennifer should do next, I turned to New York-based consumer lawyer Joel Winston. Here’s what he said:

“If the [employee] believes that some or all of her wages are protected, she should respond directly to the employer at any time after the garnishment starts. The employer is then required to report the objection to the creditor. If the creditor disagrees with the employee’s exemption claims, it is up to the creditor to request a hearing with the local civil court. The court then decides how much of the employee’s wages can be garnished and how much will be exempt. Child support payments will take priority.”

Winston also found a link to a form called “Earnings Garnishment – Debtor’s Answer” on the Wisconsin Court System website that allows employees to contest garnishments.

Winston warned that doing anything to adjust a garnishment involving child support can be tricky, and urged Jessica or anyone else in her situation to proceed with great caution.

“I would strongly advise this consumer to contact a local attorney for specific advice as soon as possible. The National Association of Consumer Law Attorneys has a lawyer referral service with a few dozen attorneys in Wisconsin,” he said. “Locally, the Wisconsin State Bar Association provides a lawyer referral service and they also offer a Reduced Fee Lawyers Service and Hotline. If a free option is a better fit, look for a legal aid society within the community. For example, the Milwaukee Legal Aid society offers free legal clinics for civil issues. Some clinics are walk-in, others are by appointment only.

There might be some reason to hope for a quick improvement in Jennifer’s situation. After chatting with Credit.com, Jennifer had a better understanding of her rights, and discussed the issue anew with her payroll department, and potentially made some headway.

“(He) first tried telling me to call the (U.S.) Department of Education and when I explained I already had, he took a closer look,” she said. Jennifer’s next paycheck should be adjusted so her total garnishment doesn’t exceed 25%, she was told, getting her another $50 weekly. “It’s not much, but it’s a start.”

More on Managing Debt:

Image: larryhw

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://fixstudentloandebt.com/ Federal Student Loan Help

    You can actually be garnished by 2 lenders at once.

  • http://fixstudentloandebt.com/ Federal Student Loan Help

    Are you still in garnishment now?

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team