Home > 2014 > Personal Finance

How to Keep Your Grandparents From Getting Ripped Off by Mail Scams

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

I don’t know about you, but I have a 79-year-old mom who seems to be on every political and religious mailing list known to man. Every day, she gets a new batch of letters emblazoned with words like “special notice,” “official survey due” and “final attempt: invoice enclosed.”

Of course, the special notice is simply an appeal for money, the official survey asks a few questions from a partisan group (and by the way, can you send a donation to support the cause?) and the invoice is actually a sales pitch. Other mail may have sticky notes, fonts that look handwritten or return addresses that fail to disclose the business. Check out this inventive junk mail sent to a Maine woman in 2012.

Today’s seniors can be vulnerable to all sorts of confusing direct mail. Marketers are counting on them not to realize that the survey didn’t come from the Census Bureau and the invoice isn’t for something they agreed to purchase.

Even those of us in a younger generation can be a target. Anyone who’s purchased a vehicle can attest to the onslaught of official-looking mail that arrives trying to sell extended warranties. It has become so bad that we no longer trust legitimate notices when they do arrive.

It has become important to keep junk mail away from those you love, especially the most vulnerable. While the information below doesn’t cover all of the different types of mail you may receive, here are three of the major categories:

1. Rules for Sweepstakes & Contests

Sweepstakes are big business, and some of these mailed promotions are outright scams. Others may be from legitimate companies that are hoping recipients will make a purchase while sending in their sweepstakes entry.

Businesses planning to use a sweepstakes to sweeten their solicitation must include all of the following information in the mailing.

  • State in the rules and on the order form that no purchase is necessary to enter.
  • State that a purchase does not increase the chances of winning.
  • Include all the contest terms and conditions.
  • List all prizes, their value and the odds of winning each one.
  • Disclose the sponsor of the promotion and its contact address.

If a sweepstakes promotion includes a reproduction of an award check, it must clearly state it’s non-negotiable and has no value.

For contests involving some level of skill, the number of rounds in the contest must be disclosed, as well as the identity of the judges and their method of judging. These contests may charge an entry fee, but the potential total cost of all rounds must be revealed. In addition, the contest sponsor must estimate and disclose the likely number of people expected to pass a round by correctly solving a problem or successfully completing the skill contest.

2. ‘Official Business’ That Isn’t So Official

The Deceptive Mailing Prevention Act of 1990 was intended to help curb the flood of government look-alike mail. While it may not have completely celiminated the number of mailings bearing official-sounding names, insignias and seals, it has put in place some requirements to make unofficial “official” mail easier to spot.

By law, any solicitation that implies a connection or endorsement by the federal government is not permitted. For example, mail that says it’s been approved by the postmaster general is a no-no. So too is anything that suggests federal benefits may be affected if a purchase is not made or that tries to sell services available free of charge from the government, unless a statement notifying recipients of that fact is included.

The law, in theory, sounds like it should prohibit government look-alike mail. In practice, there is a huge loophole for official-looking mail to climb through. Right after prohibiting these mailings, the very next paragraph of the law goes on to allow them as long as they include a disclosure stating they do not contain official government correspondence. Specifically, the upper-right quadrant of the front of an envelope or wrapper must include the words “THIS IS NOT A GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT” in at least a 12-point font. A second, longer disclaimer must be listed on the contents in at least 30-point font.

3. Sales Pitches Disguised as Invoices

Mailings designed to look like invoices are another common tactic used by some businesses. Sometimes they scream “THIRD ATTEMPT” or “FINAL NOTICE” to scare you into thinking you’re about to go to collections if you don’t pay up.

As with sweepstakes and government look-alike mail, these types of solicitations are legal as long as the company adheres to certain standards. For these mailings, the following disclaimer must be listed in at least 30-point font on the solicitation itself.


However, the law does not appear to require any disclaimer on the envelope or outer wrapper.

What to Do With Suspected Fraudulent Mail

If you find yourself on the receiving end of what could be fraudulent mail such as a sweepstakes without rules or a fake invoice without a disclaimer, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service is who you want to call. The office’s hotline is 877-876-2455. You can also fill out a complaint form online.

In the meantime, if you want to read more about what is and is not allowed, you can find it all spelled out in the Domestic Mail Manual. Click here and then scroll down to Section 9 for the details as well as examples of the required disclosures.

You’ll also want to read Stacy Johnson’s advice on how to stop junk from filling your mailbox in the first place.

 This post originally appeared on Money Talks News.

More from Money Talks News:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team