Home > Identity Theft > 5 Reasons Not to Search for Those Nude Celebrity Photos

Comments 2 Comments

A not-so funny thing happened to the Internet over Labor Day weekend. It was nearly trampled to death in a digital stampede for photographs of nude celebrities including Jennifer Lawrence, Ariana Grande, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Kate Upton, Rihanna and others. More than 100 celebrities “made” the list.

How did the pictures wind up online? The best guess so far is that this was a very target attack on celebrity accounts and not the result of a systemic problem with Apple’s iCloud, which stores user photos and other digital information, but just who was behind the crime is still unknown. The pictures were reportedly floating around on the “deep web” for a week before they hit the information highway.

Tuesday brought better news: The FBI began investigating how the pictures found their way to the public. Unfortunately, in the meantime millions of people are investigating how to view the purloined pictures. Some venues that featured the material have since taken it down — notably Perez Hilton’s eponymous site, which also issued an apology — but not, as some commentators noted, before a bunch of dough was made on page views.

What Lowering Your Guard Could Get You

You can probably spot a phishing email in your sleep, and you would no sooner respond to an email about suspicious activity on your credit card than you would leave your wallet in a crosswalk in Times Square.

However, best practices often fly out the window when it comes to salacious material about our favorite celebrities. Think about it this way: Are you willing to forego sensible web behavior when the likely outcome will be catastrophic, as you wander into the darker alleys and backstreets of the Internet where the risks outweigh all other considerations?

If you’re even tempted to conduct your own search to locate the nude celebrity photos, here are a few reasons to not give in to your curiosity.

1. Malware

One of the main consequences you can expect if you decide to do the requisite slumming to find those nude celebrity photos is, of course, malware. It may be something simple, like code that turns your computer into a spam distribution center or a more serious app that will record your keystrokes, like when you log in to your bank account. There’s no way to know what you’re getting yourself into. The best course of action is using your imagination—or possibly even your sense of what should be off-limits. Malware can often lead to identity theft, which can wreck your credit for years.

If you’ve already downloaded some of the photos, you may want to do a malware scan of your computer. Identity theft has become the third certainty in life, so make it a habit of monitoring your financial accounts regularly for signs of fraud. And keep an eye on your credit scores as well. A large, unexpected drop in your scores could signal identity theft, and you should pull your credit reports (you can get them for free once a year) to confirm. You can check your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

2. Privacy… and Respect

That’s right, privacy—or in this instance the lack of it. The onus of protecting oneself from the dangers “out there” should fall on each and every one of us, but the fact remains not everyone knows best practices (not even celebrities), and even those who do are capable of making a mistake at some point. The expectation should be a little less about survival of the fittest, and more about the general expectation of privacy. When that expectation is flouted, we are faced with a decision: Will you be a part of the problem or the solution?

As Mary Elizabeth Winstead said on Twitter:

3. Supporting a Criminal Act

If you are not particularly worried about being high-minded here, there is another consideration, which is, by looking at the pictures, you are giving criminals a purpose for their act (at least with a degree or so of separation) and causing someone distress. Is it really worth it? Without the millions of potential clicks, there is much less motivation for hackers to access these photos.

4. A Tainted Web History

Another consideration is your web browsing history. Here I am not only referring to the one that someone else can see if they look at your computer-specific history, but the one that advertisers use to target you. Do you really want the kinds of products that choose “nude celebrity photos” as a search term?

5. You Have Better Things to Do

Finally, yes, there are so many better ways to spend your time online. The photos in question were never meant for your eyes. Isn’t that reason enough to avoid them?

More on Identity Theft:

Image: pichet_w

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Inseouk Hong

    I wouldn’t be surprised if those pictures were intentionally leaked by the celebrities themselves. If you care about privacy and respect stop linking your nude pics to a cloud server. Malware? Lol are you serious?

  • puzzle

    If I had a reason to download these they are not hard to find, at the right site there’s no malware, tainted web history? I’m already on a watch list probualy

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team