Home > 2014 > Credit Score

Why You Shouldn’t Get Too Excited About the New FICO Score… Yet

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

For consumers with collection accounts on their credit reports, FICO Score 9 — the new version of FICO scores that will be available to lenders in the fall of 2014 — can’t come fast enough.

FICO 9 will ignore paid collection accounts, giving consumers with past credit problems a real shot at rebuilding their credit if they can resolve their debts. It will also give less weight to medical collection accounts than it does to other types of accounts in collection. This can significantly benefit consumers who have otherwise paid their bills on time but ran into a problem with a doctor or hospital bill.

But just because the new model is available to lenders doesn’t mean it will be used by them. The process of switching to a different version of the score isn’t like a simple computer program update where you just click a button and update to the latest version in a few moments. It’s much more complicated than that.

The new score will become available in the fall of 2014 through each of the credit reporting agencies. Lenders who decide to try those scores will go through a testing process before they decide whether to adopt them. Barry Paperno, who worked at FICO for many years, explains:

“(Lenders) begin to test it on their portfolios through a process called ‘validation’ to help determine when, and if, they choose to go with the new score,” he says. “Briefly, validation consists of looking at past credit decisions and customer credit performance using both the FICO version used in the initial decision and a ‘what if’ scenario using FICO 9. If, from this analysis, it looks like FICO 9 would have done a better job of weeding out more poor performers than the score they used, the lender may decide the possible reduction in future losses will be worth the resources required to switch to FICO 9. If, on the other hand, the validation shows FICO 9 not appearing to provide any increased risk prediction value, then they’re likely to stick with what they’re currently using.”

This process takes time and can be costly for lenders, who like any business, may have other priorities. This is not a “free update” either, so budget constraints may be a factor as well.

The other issue is that FICO scores, when they are used, are just one part of the approval process. “Many of the large banks use their own custom proprietary scoring models in which FICO scores are just one of many components,” Paperno says. “Making changes to these complex scoring systems, as would be required by a change to FICO 9, is no small logistical feat.” In addition, a lender reviewing a credit report would still be free to question collection accounts or decline applications from consumers whose credit reports contained one or more of them.

Homebuyers Beware

We frequently hear from consumers who say they want to clean up their credit to buy a home. And often they believe that part of that process means paying off collection accounts. Unfortunately, they may be surprised to learn that simply paying a collection account usually doesn’t boost their credit scores, or allow them to qualify for a lower rate home loan.

Most mortgage lenders make loans that conform to the requirements of Fannie Mae and/or Freddie Mac, so that those loans can later be sold on the secondary market. The FICO scores accepted in Fannie Mae’s Desktop Underwriting, a widely used automated underwriting system, are from the standard FICO credit scoring model developed before FICO 8 — which until now has been the most recent version of the FICO score and was introduced in 2008.

It’s unclear when these new standards will begin to impact the mortgage industry. Ultimately each lenders’ system for evaluating and approving loan applications is their own secret sauce, and they get to make the final decision as whether to say yes or no. As long as they don’t break any laws regarding discrimination, they get to decide how to make that decision.

Keep in mind that some lenders also use VantageScore credit scores, and the latest version — VantageScore 3 — already ignores paid collection accounts.

What You Can Do

All this means that consumers must continue to be proactive about their credit, and make sure they are taking steps to build and maintain strong credit. That includes the following:

But don’t expect major changes in your scores overnight. “If the past is any indication, don’t expect lenders to adopt FICO 9 too quickly,” Paperno says.

More on Credit Reports and Credit Scores:

Image: lookslike

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team