Home > Personal Finance > The Craziest Résumé Lies Employers Have Found

Comments 2 Comments

More than half of hiring managers have caught applicants lying on their résumés, according to a new survey from CareerBuilder, and the lies range from small embellishments to unrealistic claims.

The magnitude of the lie doesn’t matter, because any form of intentionally misleading a prospective employer is sure to hurt your chances of getting the job. If the right-vs.-wrong argument against lying doesn’t sway you, take some advice from a professional: Rosemary Haefner, vice president of human resources at CareerBuilder, elaborated on the consequences:

“Trust is very important in professional relationships, and by lying on your résumé, you breach that trust from the very outset,” Haefner is quoted saying in a news release about the survey. “If you want to enhance your résumé, it’s better to focus on playing up tangible examples from your actual experience. Your résumé doesn’t necessarily have to be the perfect fit for an organization, but it needs to be relevant and accurate.”

10 Ridiculous Résumé Lies

Harris Poll conducted the survey for CareerBuilder from May 13 to June 6, and the results include responses from 2,188 hiring managers and human resource professionals who work in a variety of industries and corporate environments. Of that group, 58% said they’ve caught lies on résumés, and a third of those HR workers said they’ve seen an uptick in such lies since the recession. Common embellishments include skill sets and previous work responsibilities, but some survey respondents had some off-the-wall examples. Here are the best résumé lies shared with CareerBuilder.

1. Daddy Deception

An applicant listed his father’s work experience as his own, because the two shared a name. Junior didn’t get away with it.

2. Political Impossibility

If you’re going to lie about your experience (which you shouldn’t), you should probably make sure you claim something realistic: One person listed a previous job as an assistant to the prime minister in a country that doesn’t have a prime minister.

3. Cracking Under Pressure

A basketball player with an excellent free-throw record shows the ability to maintain composure in stressful situations. This claim blew up in an applicant’s face when, under the pressure of an interview, he admitted he lied on his résumé about being a high school basketball free-throw champion.

4. Champion of Lies

The Olympics are pretty well documented on the Internet, so it’s not surprising that someone got busted for claiming to be an Olympic medalist.

5. In the Doghouse

An applicant said he had previously been a construction supervisor, but his experience consisted solely of building a doghouse a few years before.

6. The Prodigy

A 32-year-old applicant claimed to have 25 years of work experience.

7. They’ll Never Check References, Right?

Someone took on to go-big-or-go-home mentality by claiming two decades of experience babysitting celebrities, like Tom Cruise and Madonna.

8. It’s the Little Things

A potential employer contacted three previous employers listed on a hopeful’s résumé: One job lasted two days, the other for one day and the other was completely made up.

9. These Aren’t the Droids You’re Looking for…

After getting fired, a job seeker re-applied to the company, listing the same company in his previous experience with one small change: He said he quit.

10. The Split Test

Perhaps in an effort to determine the best résumé, one person applied twice for the same position, listing different work histories on each application. The hiring manager noticed.

Common Résumé Mistakes

Those are extreme examples, but it’s not unusual for job applicants to lie in the application process (and get caught). Among hiring managers who have experience finding lies in résumés, these were the most common fibs: an embellished skill set (57% of HR workers had caught this), exaggerated responsibilities (55%), dates of employment (42%), job title (34%), academic degree (33%), previous employers (26%) and awards (18%).

Some industries are more diligent about fact-checking your application (or they attract an exceptional number of liars): 73% of financial services employers catch lies on résumés, 71% in hospitality, 63% in information technology, 63% of health care employers with more than 50 workers and 59% in retail.

Employers do a variety of reference and fact checks on their prospective workers, so you need to review more than just your résumé for accuracy. An employer may also run a credit check on you (with your permission), so you should check your credit reports in advance of a job search. If you find errors, address them immediately, otherwise, your credit history may inaccurately reflect poorly on you.

Checking your credit report doesn’t cost you anything. You’re entitled to a free annual credit report from each of the three major credit reporting agencies. You can also check your credit scores for free, which will help you stay on track as you work to improve your credit — you can get two of your scores for free on Credit.com, as well as other insights into your credit history.

If your credit report is accurate but not in as good a shape you’d like it to be, you should at least be able to explain the reasons behind negative information. It goes back to the idea of trust: If you’re honest about past mistakes and explain what you’ve learned, that bad information in your credit history may not be as damaging as you think it may be.

More on Credit Reports and Credit Scores:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Rebel

    My credit problems are not a potential employer’s business. Credit probems do not impede my work habits. I am a loyal employee and I have very high work standards.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team