Home > 2014 > Identity Theft

How Crime Rings Use ‘Invisible Ink’ to Take Over Your Computer

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

LAS VEGAS – Cyber gangs have begun using the digital equivalent of invisible ink to disguise the malicious coding that helps them take control of your computer and put it to criminal use.

Steganography—the craft of hiding something seemingly out in the open—is an old secret agent trick. Now cybercriminals have adapted the technique to help them carry out drive-by download infections, according to research findings disclosed at the Black Hat conference here this morning by Dell SecureWorks senior researcher Dr. Brett Stone-Gross.

In a drive-by download, malicious software gets inserted into the web browser of an unsuspecting Internet user—just by navigating to a corrupted web page.

Specifically, Stone-Gross uncovered the latest techniques bad guys are using for hiding something called a malware downloader, whose function is to relay commands to an infected computer. Criminals use steganography to make malware downloaders largely invisible to antivirus filters and cleanup tools.

This cloaking technique has helped the bad guys sustain drive-by infections on eHow.com, a high-traffic do-it-yourself site, and on Livestrong.com, a nutrition and fitness site. “By compromising these high-profile websites, they were able to direct a lot of traffic to a malicious server that then infects computers with additional malware,” says Stone-Gross.

The bad guys’ end game, in this particular instance, was to replenish networks of infected computers known as a botnets. They then sent instructions for the botnets to repeatedly click on certain ads as part of a click fraud scheme designed to trigger payments to the crooks.

Botnet Use Growing

Botnets are the highly versatile power plants of cybercrime and are often comprised of 10,000 or more infected computers that respond to commands from a lone controller. Botnets spread spam and infections, launch denial of service attacks, conduct click fraud campaigns and hijack online bank accounts.

And botnets increasingly are being used by crime rings and spying collectives to infiltrate and plunder company and government networks. They are useful for carrying out industrial espionage, wire fraud and even market manipulation schemes. “Attackers are using malware to build huge, private cloud computing networks out of our own compromised computers—and an attacker with such free compute power as a resource is a dangerous proposition,” says Kevin Epstein, vice president of advanced security and governance at security firm Proofpoint.

The good guys are making a great effort to close the gap. Giant security conferences like Black Hat and the RSA conference held in San Francisco each spring highlight how much brain power and resources the commercial sector is pouring into rooting out and undercutting cybercriminals. Gartner research director Lawrence Pingree calculates global spending on security hardware and software will continue growing at a robust 9% a year clip, topping $99.2 billion by 2018.

But the bad guys are smart, motivated and well-funded too. And they’ve proven to be terrific at innovation. As Stone-Gross’ gumshoeing shows, they are rapidly advancing the art of making hacking tools stealthier. And they are getting more focused on probing weaknesses in nooks and crannies of older systems, while also aggressively probing fresh vulnerabilities born of Internet-centric commerce and culture.

Growing Retail Threats

The recent rash of data breaches at Target, Neiman Marcus, Michaels and other major retail chains are a case in point; they all stemmed from attacks on in-store point-of-sale transaction devices and old-school, on-premises data storage servers, systems not so long ago considered mundane.

A sign of the times: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security last week issued an alert to the retail sector warning about the dangers of the Backoff family of malware, now in active use by hackers who’ve made an art form of scraping memory modules in point-of-sale systems for payment card data, including PINs.

“The Backoff authors either wrote the malware from scratch or hired someone to do so,” says Karl Sigler, threat intelligence manager at Trustwave. “The code does not borrow from other common PoS malware. This makes it undetectable to every signature based antivirus and intrusion detection solution available before the indicators of compromise were publicly released.”

Every day, new evidence surfaces in the security community showing how botnets and stealthy tactics are being leveraged in clever new ways to rip off and scam consumers and to pilfer proprietary data from companies of all sizes, at scale.

And if you’re wondering how it might be possible for a Russian ring to amass more than 1 billion stolen passwords, as disclosed in a recent article from The New York Times, it comes down to the same thing. All large scale data thefts leverage botnets and stealthy hacking tools and methods in one way or another.

“It is in the crime rings’ best interests to create botnets that are as large as possible and that persist for as long as possible, and making the malware undetectable improves the chances of both aims,” observes Greg Kazmierczak, CTO of quantum computing company Wave Systems. “In the continuing arms race we expect attackers to move even lower in the software stack to accelerate and improve effectiveness of malware infections.”

So what can individuals and companies do? Become more aware and adopt wiser behaviors. Let’s continue the discussion.

This post originally appeared on ThirdCertainty.com.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team