Home > 2014 > Managing Debt

How One Man Learned to Fight Back Against Debt Collectors

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 8 Comments

When his mother, already distraught from her father’s recent death, received a phone call from a debt collector early this year, “Roger” (a pseudonym) was angry. “I saw her get the call at the funeral,” he said.

The debt collector was trying to tell Roger’s mother she owed a medical bill she thought had been paid in full, covered by insurance and her co-pay. This wasn’t the first time they heard about this debt. In a previous conversation the collection agent had said that if she believed she did not owe the money, she needed to file a police report alleging fraud.

Instead of fighting with the collector again — at her father’s funeral, no less — she handed the phone to her son, a self-taught expert on debt collection rights.

Roger had already discovered firsthand that not all debt collectors follow the letter of the law.

A few months prior, he had been contacted by a collector who was trying to locate his grandfather about a credit card debt he allegedly owed. Roger was not about to reveal his grandfather’s whereabouts, and instead set about trying to solve the problem, researching what the collectors could and could not do. “I ended up pushing back,” he said. He said he learned mostly from blogs and comment boards. “I did learn the hard way that not every resource is accurate, and many blogs and sites blow the laws out of proportion.” he said in an email. “I learned not to let the collector in on how much you know,” he added.

How to Handle a Call

It was purely coincidence that Roger’s mom (and by extension, he) got a call on the day of his grandfather’s funeral, but Roger was prepared. First, he wanted to see evidence that his mother actually owed money.

Roger asked for validation of the debt, which he knew his mom was entitled to request under federal law. The collection agency presumably did not read the original documents before putting them in the mail to her; the supporting documents they mailed showed his mother’s account had a zero balance! Roger thinks that perhaps his mother’s “debt” was part of a portfolio sold to a debt buyer that in turn hired the collection agency, and that his mother’s account was put in the portfolio by mistake.

Roger also knew there was another way to stop the collection calls. He helped his mother notify the debt collector, in writing, that “all telephone calls are inconvenient” (emphasis added).  He used the word “inconvenient” deliberately, because the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act forbids contact at “a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer.” By letting the collection agency know that phone calls were inconvenient he was insisting they communicate in writing.

All the while, Roger was documenting every contact. He photographed his mother’s cellphone screen to show dates and times of phone conversations and took copious notes. He used certified mail, keeping receipts. Once he tried to fax documents to the number on the collectors’ letterhead; it was a dead number.

After about two weeks (and at least seven calls), “We just said, ‘Look, just tell us what we have to do to make the calls stop.'” Roger said. When they didn’t, they decided it was time to get an attorney involved.

Because Roger had kept such careful records, it was clear that the debt collection agency had not played by the rules. Not only that, but his mother hadn’t owed any money in the first place. The case was settled, and while he can’t reveal the amount of the settlement, the collector ended up paying far more to settle than his mother was alleged to have owed.

Clear & Simple

Roger has become a regular commenter on the Credit.com blog, particularly about stories focusing on debt-collection practices. He says he likes to write to fellow commenters because collectors’ failures to follow the rules established by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act “just makes me mad.”

His advice to others who think that their rights are being violated:

  • Record everything. Keep a log of phone calls, with the exact time and phone number, and take notes.
  • Keep all receipts.
  • Communicate via certified mail, and if possible, put the certified mail number in the letter. And keep that letter simple. “Three sentences at most. 1. I dispute this debt in its entirety and request validation. 2. All telephone calls are inconvenient. 3. Sincerely, you. Nothing more is needed!” he advised.

Roger didn’t like spending time and money to dispute the debt, and he said there would have been no lawsuit had the collection agency only honored the request made in the very first phone call: to stop calling.

The settlement included having the debt collectors agree to remove the collection account from his mother’s credit reports. That’s important because even though she had owed nothing, a collections account can seriously damage your credit score — and the higher it is before, the more a derogatory item can hurt. It’s a good idea for everyone to check credit reports and credit scores regularly. Mistakes can and do happen, and it’s important to make sure your reports are accurate. The three major credit-reporting agencies are all required to provide at least one free credit report per year if you request it. You can also get two of your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • BlindlyCommenting

    Knowing what do to do when creditors or collectors call is a very important individual responsibility. Everyone needs to have a handle on what these guys can and cannot do.

    But be wary of people that hold themselves out as non-attorney “experts” in debt collection law. Especially if they are frequent commenters online. This can happen: http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/circuit-court-upholds-award-of-fees-for-defendant-in-an-absolutely-crazy-fdcpa-case/

    • “Roger”

      You’re absolutely right on both points. Know your rights so you can protect yourself if they are violated. One should also be wary of anything posted on the internet as a general rule of thumb, which is why an attorney became involved when the time was right. In any case, one should always stick to the indisputable points of the law, which is why the letters they received used only terms that were present in the FDCPA, and not 3-page form letters found online (that are nonsense in general).

      That article/case you cited was an unique exception. Further reading shows there was a lot more to that story than that article addressed. For starters, the plaintiff was offered a settlement early on for the maximum amount he could have been awarded under the law; he declined. He made it no secret that he wanted to draw the whole case out as long as he could to make it as expensive as possible for the defendant. He even went as far as to make quasi-sexual remarks towards the defendant’s counsel and bragged about it. If that wasn’t enough, he even e-mailed that counsel to invite them to read all of his opinions and remarks about how he was actively trying to turn the whole case into a circus. To make it worse, he acted the same way in court.

      There’s a lot more to it, but that’s the general idea behind why he was found to have brought his case in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment. One should not be scared to assert their rights out of fear that what happened in that article could happen to them; an honest consumer trying to protect themselves should have no worry of anything like this happening, especially if you seek the help of a consumer protection attorney when you feel it’s time to finally take action after exhausting other efforts.

  • heavyw8t

    As disturbing as it is that the parasite was calling about a debt that did not exist, doesn’t anybody else question WHY her cell phone was not powered off during her husband’s funeral? Is ANYTHING so important that it can’t wait until after the funeral? I mean, everybody she knows is at the funeral. Who could be calling that can’t wait an hour? I take my privacy one step further and NEVER answer a call that is not from a number in my contacts. Anybody else can leave a voice mail and I will decide if I call them back. Also, any call coming in as a private number or with caller ID blocked is rejected and the phone hangs up on them.

    • “Roger”

      It was her father’s funeral, not her husband’s – just to clarify. The call was received during the second day of visitation of the funeral, and not during the final service. The number on the caller ID was local (despite that the agency was not; good ole’ caller ID spoofing) and was answered in case it was an old friend or relative with a new number that was inquiring about the passing of her father – perhaps after reading the obit in the paper, which had happened several times that day.

      Normally she will not answer unknown or private number calls, and I agree with you 100%. Given the situation and circumstances, it was all-around bad timing.

  • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

    Becca —
    Sorry you are going through all this. Did you have insurance that should be helping with these expenses?

    You don’t need to worry about wage garnishment unless you are sued and a court orders it. However, you certainly cannot pay if you have no income. First, ask the collector to validate the debt, which means sending you, via postal mail, an explanation of why you owe the money. A legitimate collector will send it.

    Also consider talking with a bankruptcy attorney. In most cases a consultation is free.

    Good luck with this, and let us know if we can help further.

  • Nargeaux

    @Roger can you please help me I was never seen the day I went to the hospital, they took my information and withdrawn blood and told me to sit in the waiting area but I ended up leaving because I sat there for 6 -8 hours, I even have a paper from the front desk receptionist/ nurse stating I was not seen and that I left
    , what should I do? Im 21 trying to learn, I’m in college I stay with my mom, she’s my caretaker but I received this and I’m panicking below is a picture of the letter I just received

  • Jeanine Skowronski

    Hello, Elaine,

    Sorry for your loss. Unfortunately, a creditor could have possibly secured a default judgment if you missed the notice and didn’t show up to court. Sometimes, creditors or collectors will work out or negotiate a payment plan post-judgement. You may want to consult a consumer attorney to learn of your best options. Some do offer free consults.

    Thank you,


    • Elaine Nichols

      Thank you Jeanine. After doing some searching in the court records, and looking over the alleged judgement, it looks to be a fake judgement, as the court has no record of the case number, and there is no stamp or signature from the court on it. It came with the first notice, so I know that I didn’t miss it. I think it was meant to intimidate.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team