Home > Identity Theft > Was Dairy Queen Hacked?

Comments 0 Comments

Even ice cream isn’t safe from hackers.

Security watchdog Brian Krebs reported late Tuesday night that venerable summer-fun brand Dairy Queen may have been victimized by credit card thieves using techniques vaguely similar to the criminals who attacked Target stores last year.

The news comes just days after the Secret Service issued a bulletin warning U.S. retail outlets that hackers have become very efficient at stealing cards from stores that allow remote access of credit card processing computers. Using malicious software called “Backoff,” criminal gangs have compromised stores of all sizes. The impact is huge.

“The Secret Service currently estimates that over 1,000 U.S. business are affected,” the advisory says.

The memo says the Backoff software has been used to attack store computers since October 2013, but wasn’t detected by antivirus software until August of this year, giving criminals an incredibly long window to rampage through networks holding credit card data.

It’s not clear that Backoff was used in the alleged Dairy Queen attack, but Krebs speculates the two could be connected. He quotes an anonymous fraud manager at a credit union in the Midwest who said he’d seen 50 cases of fraud involving cards used at a Dairy Queen in recent days.

“We’re just getting all kinds of fraud cases coming in from members having counterfeit copies of their cards being used at dollar stores and grocery stores,” the fraud expert is quoted as saying.

Krebs said he’s heard similar stories from other bank officials about fraud from cards used at Dairy Queen stores in Florida, Alabama, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas.

Officials at Dairy Queen’s corporate headquarters told CNBC that they had not heard of fraud problems, but they wouldn’t necessarily know — most DQs are privately-owned franchises, and are not required to inform headquarters about security issues, according to Krebs.

“In a world where getting your information stolen in a data breach has become the third certainty in life, it is quite worrisome to me that a major national franchiser would not, among its myriad rules of conduct and practice for franchisees, require franchisees to follow standard data breach protocols in order to protect customers, franchisees and the goodwill of the mothership,” says Adam Levin, who is the chairman and co-founder of Credit.com and Identity Theft 911.

“This raises the question: What other national franchisers have no breach notification policy for their franchisees?” Levin adds.

It’s quite possible the hack involves a small number of local stores — similar to the UPS Store hack revealed last week — but it may be some time before the extent of the reported DQ attack is understood, given the lack of centralized reporting.

Other recently-reported card hacks include Jimmy John’s sandwich shops and car washes. In each case, cards weren’t skimmed with hardware, but rather stolen remotely with software.

“The investigators I spoke with … all of the breached locations had one thing in common: They were all relying on point-of-sale systems that had remote access with weak passwords enabled,” Krebs wrote.

Hackers who steal bulk card data in this manner sell it online to other criminals, who sometimes use it to create “clone” cards by encoding the stolen data on new credit card plastic; then the clone cards are used at gas stations and other shops where close inspection is unlikely.

If you’ve ever had a sales clerk ask to see your card, and then manually enter the last four digits of the card into the cash register, that small check is designed to stop some versions of card cloning.

Consumers who’ve indulged in DQ desserts this summer shouldn’t over-react. As usual, they are not responsible for fraud that appears on their card, as long as they report it in a timely manner. Note, however, that criminals in this case used the stolen data at dollar stores. Consumers are much less likely to spot low-value fraud; so watch those bills carefully. If you don’t report it, you’ll pay for it.

In addition to keeping an eye on bank and credit card statements, monitoring your credit scores can help you detect potential fraud if you see a big, unexpected drop in your scores. If this happens, check your credit reports for accounts and unpaid debts that don’t belong to you. You can check your credit scores for free every month through Credit.com, and you can get your credit reports for free once a year through AnnualCreditReport.com.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Jim Corsair 

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team