Home > Managing Debt > The Ambulance Loophole That Could Cost You Big

Comments 1 Comment

When Jo-Anne deLeon called 911 last month because her husband Jimmy was having a heart attack, two ambulances showed up at her house. Then, a $750 bill showed up. The bill wasn’t for the ambulance, or the ride. It was for the paramedic inside ambulance No. 2, after he jumped into ambulance No. 1.

The deLeons are on Medicare, which pays for ambulance rides, but a quirk in Medicare law means that Medicare sometimes doesn’t pay for the care patients receive on the way to the hospital. There are exceptions, but essentially, Medicare pays for a simple ride to the hospital, known as BLS, or basic life services, typically provided by volunteers with limited training. When additional care is required, known as ALS or advanced life services, and a trained paramedic hops on board a BLS ambulance, Medicare won’t pay for that.

The deLeons, naturally, knew nothing about this distinction.

“We feel as if we were abused just for needing ambulance services,” Jo-Anne deLeon said. “What a farce this whole thing was.”

The situation the deLeons encountered is known as a “paramedic intercept.” It’s much more common in rural areas, such as the farm country of Duchess County, New York, where the deLeons live. To spread service coverage far and wide, many agencies take a two-tiered approach to 911 calls. Volunteers or other agencies provide basic hospital transport for emergencies, but they call for backup from trained paramedics when necessary. The ALS paramedic will often meet the ambulance en route and hop aboard — intercept it — or sometimes, meet the BLS vehicle at the location of the 911 call.

Medicare billing, which can be arcane, does not allow the agency that provides the intercepting paramedic to bill Medicare. In some situations, there’s a formal agreement in place which allows the BLS provider to bill on behalf of the ALS provider, but those are unusual, in part because they can result in lower fees. The paramedic agency can sometimes charge higher fees by billing patients directly instead, but they also face plenty of unpaid bills — and angry consumers, like the deLeons, who are fighting the bill.

In other words, no one is really happy with the awkward situation, including some members of Congress. Beginning 15 years ago, legislation has been introduced and reintroduced to plug the gap in coverage, such as the 2009 Medicare Paramedic Intercept Services Coverage Act. It, like the others, died in committee. Way back in 1994, the General Accounting Office identified the problem in a report to Congress.

Tristan North, Vice President of Government Affairs for the American Ambulance Association, said his agency hasn’t “had much success” while supporting changes to the Medicare law. James L. Robinson, president of The International Association of EMS Chiefs, said the same thing.

“This is a significant problem, and it’s got to be addressed,” said Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), back in 2011. “The last thing a senior living on a fixed income needs is to be whacked with hundreds of dollars in unexpected ambulance fees. The current policy unfairly discriminates against Medicare beneficiaries. We simply cannot have seniors second guessing whether to call an ambulance for fear of the bill. These are important health care services and they should be covered. Hopefully, CMS (which administers Medicare) will change its policy.”

That seems unlikely. In a statement to Credit.com, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid spelled out the policy.

“The Medicare benefit for ambulance services is limited by the statute (the Social Security Law Act) to a transportation benefit; that is, payment may only be made to the entity that actually transports the patient,” the agency said. “Except in very narrow circumstances spelled out by statute, the paramedics would be paid under a contract with the transporting entity; they cannot directly bill and be paid by Medicare.”

The tricky ALS/BLS distinction can cost anyone — not just Medicare patients. Private insurance often pays for both transportation and paramedic care, but policies vary widely. There can be separate deductibles, for example, or other surprises. As with all things medical, it’s important to appoint someone other than the patient to ask questions, both when care is given, and later, when the bills arrive.

Medical debts that go unpaid can cause serious problems for your credit. If you’ve been trying to sort through medical bill issues, it’s a good idea to check your credit reports to see if any have been sent to a debt collector. Collections accounts can lower your credit scores considerably, and can cause problems for you when you need to obtain credit down the road. You can check your credit reports for free once a year through AnnualCreditReport.com, and dispute any errors or issues with the creditor as soon as possible. You can also monitor your credit scores through free services like Credit.com to watch for changes in your score that could indicate a problem that needs your attention.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: katifcam

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Sunshine43

    Just happened to me! Disgraceful, bordering on corruption.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team