Home > Managing Debt > Are Americans More in Debt Than the Rest of the World?

Comments 0 Comments

Americans have a global reputation for being a) bad at soccer (futbol) and b) good at spending money they don’t have. Looks like it might be time to challenge both conventional beliefs.

As the surprisingly game Americans took the “pitch” on Tuesday against Belgium, many observers conceded that the U.S. team rightly earned its spot in the final 16, successfully fighting through the “Group of Death” and edging out traditional power Portugal. Despite losing 2 – 1 to Belgium, it’s clear that U.S. soccer is no longer a laughing matter.

The rest of the world should probably stop laughing at Americans’ credit card spending habits, too. Compared to traditionally more frugal cultures around the globe, the image of the overspending Yank isn’t only unfair, it’s inaccurate. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development, U.S. household debt as a percentage of disposable income puts the Americans smack in the middle of OECD nations competing at the World Cup. And U.S. household debt has been on a steady downward trajectory since the economic crisis — not true of many other nations.

The OECD’s household debt ratio compares all debt families have — including mortgages — with their net disposable income. (More on the data here.) Higher numbers mean more debt. A number over 100 indicates debts higher than income, though that’s not surprising when mortgages are included.

household debt

It’s true that Belgium, the U.S. opponent on Tuesday, soundly beats the Americans on debt levels. The Americans’ debt ratio was 114.9 in 2012, the latest year available, while Belgium’s was 98.2. But Belgian’s debt is up from 78 in 2008, while the Americans is down from 134 that same year. In this respect, the Americans are trending in the right direction.

Several nations who qualified for the final 16 are included in the OECD data. The Dutch squeaked by Mexico this weekend, which must be a good distraction for their homeland. Known for their frugality, the Dutch are currently being crushed under a mountain of household debt — mainly mortgage debt. Their ratio is 311.5, easily the highest among OECD nations.

The U.S.’s 114.9 ratio would whip the Swiss (201.2), lose a squeaker to Greece (109.7) and France (104.5), and lose rather handily to Germany (93.2). That balance sheet result oddly parallels results on the pitch, no?

Among the six other World Cup participants covered by the OECD data, the U.S. would enjoy a solid 4-2 record when comparing debt levels. The Yanks would beat Spain (141.1), Japan (131.5), Portugal (147.6) and the United Kingdom (151.5) while losing to Australia (92.8) and Italy (94.4). It should be noted that 19 of the 32 World Cup nations are not included in the OECD data.

As with all economic data, like all sports results, there are flaws in the calculations. A lower household debt ratio doesn’t necessarily mean a stronger economy or a less greedy population. But as with this year’s results with the World Cup, the numbers certainly indicate Americans probably aren’t the unsophisticated soccer players or spenders we are made out to be.

There is one major caveat in the OCED report, however. All debt is not created equal. Most economists (and people, too!) would agree that high-interest credit card debt is far worse than low-interest mortgages. You’d think that a nation with more of one or the other might be greater or lesser trouble. On this score, the Americans do in fact rank badly. Among 26 OCED nations, long-term loans like mortgages make up more than 80% of total household debt, and in 10 countries, it’s 90%. In the U.S., it was only 70.7%, meaning nearly one-third of Americans’ debt is short-term loans, like credit cards. Ouch. Only Italy, at 69.9%, was worse. On this count, the U.S. still has some catching up to do.

On an individual note, debt can also have a big impact on your credit — good or bad. You can check your credit reports for free once a year from each of the three major credit reporting agencies through AnnualCreditReport.com, and there are free services, like Credit.com, that will let you see your credit scores, too. You can learn a lot about how your debt affects your credit standing by checking your credit reports and scores regularly.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: Janka Dharmasena

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team