Home > 2014 > Students

New Law Would Stop Lenders from “Harassing” Parents of Dead Students

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Here’s a question to ponder: How long should a student-loan company — or its subcontracted servicer — wait before attempting to collect on a debt from a grieving parent who had co-signed for her recently deceased son?

That’s the essence of a question that Sen. Sherrod Brown asked when he introduced a fellow Ohioan, Olivia Katbi at his recent press conference. Olivia is the sister of 24-year-old Andrew Katbi, a third-year Duke University law-school student who was killed a year ago when his car was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 77.

Soon after his passing, Andrew’s family forwarded copies of the death certificate to his education lenders. Two of the companies immediately discharged his remaining obligations. A third, however, just couldn’t let it go. By Olivia’s account, the family endured nine months of incessantly harassing phone calls and bureaucratic runarounds. The company finally relented but, perhaps, only after Olivia’s ambitious social media campaign shamed the lender into it.

No parent is emotionally equipped to deal with a child’s death, let alone has the fortitude to untangle the administrative details of his life after the fact — which, in Andrew Katbi’s instance, had the added complication of co-signed student loans.

Brown hopes to help. He plans to introduce a bill that requires education lenders to more fully and clearly divulge fundamentally important contractual terms and conditions, and also to set forth their policies and protocols for dealing with a primary (student) borrower’s death or permanent disability.

Certainly, more disclosure is better than less, particularly for financial matters that many struggle to understand—without the added stress of a life-altering event. But if the ultimate objective is to somehow force the lenders into forgiving the debts of deceased primary borrowers as a matter of course, think again. A concession of that magnitude belongs in the standard contractual boilerplate. Otherwise, lenders or their agents will continue to grant forgiveness on a case-by-case basis.

Letting the Co-Signer Off the Hook

Co-signed loans are a form of credit enhancement. By requiring a second signature, the lender is, in effect, saying that the primary borrower doesn’t have what it takes to back the loan by himself. In the case of a young adult with little substantive credit history, conditioning a loan on the creditworthiness of a co-borrower makes sense — but not for the life of the loan.

As the young borrower begins to repay his debts, he also begins to establish a track record, which, over the course of two or three years, should amount to enough data for a loan application to be considered on its own merits. Add that to the fact that it’s virtually impossible to discharge student-loan debts in bankruptcy — which is a hefty credit enhancement by itself — and a strong case can be made for the release of a co-signer’s obligation after 36 reasonably on-time payments. I emphasize reasonably because we’re talking about inexperienced borrowers who don’t deserve to be so harshly penalized for missing a few due dates on their way to becoming familiar with the process of repayment. That’s what late fees are for.

While we’re at it, let’s also do something about lenders that automatically declare loans to be in default when the primary or secondary borrower dies, becomes permanently disabled or is financially compromised, even when the payments continue to be made. On time and in full.

Think about it: Which constitutes financial harm: the loss of a credit enhancement (the co-signer) or nonpayment on a loan? Any lender that’s foolish enough to pursue a technical (non-cash) default through a judicial system that favors hard-pressed consumers who still manage to meet their financial obligations may as well toss the money it will spend in legal fees out the window.

Moreover, if a lender is so worried about the health and well-being of its primary borrower — a young person who is statistically unlikely to meet a premature demise — or an older secondary borrower, another segment of the financial services industry has a cure for that. It’s called insurance — term life, not credit life — and it’s a lot cheaper than going to court or trying to battle a blistering Twitter campaign.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More on Student Loans:

Image: moodboard

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team