Home > Personal Finance > New Ruling: Debt Collectors Could Be Fined $1,500 Every Time They Call

Comments 8 Comments

Consumers who don’t want to be contacted by debt collectors on their cellphones may have a powerful new ruling on their side. It may not only help them stop these calls, but it may increase the chances that they can collect damages of $500 to $1,500 per call.

In a recent 11th Circuit case, Osorio v. State Farm Bank, the court reinforced restrictions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that, among other things, prohibit collectors from using automated dialing systems (more commonly known as “robocalls”) to call consumers on their cellphones without the consumer’s express permission.

“The moral of that opinion is ‘no means no,’” says attorney Billy Howard, director of the consumer protection division of Morgan & Morgan.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act has been federal law since 1991. It specifically aims to restrict telemarketing and the use of automated dialing systems to contact consumers without their express consent.

The reason this ruling is significant is that in the past, some courts have been divided on whether consumers who have given their cellphone number to a creditor or collector can revoke that permission, and if so, whether they can do so verbally.  In this case, the court opined that consumers who have given collectors permission to call their cellphones can revoke their consent verbally. “This is the only appellate opinion,” says Howard. “Although it’s not binding on someone in other parts of the country, it’s very persuasive,” he says.

Consumers who tell a bill collector not to contact them on their cellphone should understand there can be consequences, particularly if the collector has no other way to contact them. Ignoring collectors isn’t always a good strategy. But for consumers who are getting calls for the wrong person, for debts they don’t believe they owe, or for debts that are too old, this ruling could prove extremely helpful in their efforts to stop them. Even debtors who know they owe a debt but cannot afford to pay it may want to put a stop to robocalls on their cellphones.

“You can tell a debt collector, ‘Don’t call my cellphone. I will pay you when I can’,” Howard advises. That’s important, he says, because consumers should not feel pressured to pay those debts if they cannot make ends meet. “People should not pay their debts out of order. They should make their mortgage payments, buy food and medicine (and) take care of themselves and their families first.”

Consumers who are getting robocalls on their cellphones should keep accurate records of those calls, suggests Howard, and talk with a consumer law attorney.

Individuals dealing with collection accounts should also check their free credit reports to see whether those accounts appear on their credit. And because collection accounts can have a significant impact on credit scores, monitoring your credit scores (which you can get for free at Credit.com) is also a good step.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    We published a story about that very problem:
    Credit Report Double Jeopardy Means Double Damage

  • Eddie J

    This ruling is too little too late. Credit applications ALREADY have contract clauses that state that, by applying for a credit card, you agree to be contacted via any phone number you list on your application. If you don’t sign the agreement, you don;t get the credit card. It’s blackmail. They don;t care that your phone, which you pay for, is for your convenience, not theirs. Also, why would the article tell people who are already in trouble and have no money, to contact a lawyer to defend themselves against unscrupulous collectors?? Who is going to pay the lawyer?? Don;t you think those collectors know that? Finally, if they want meaningful reform on the collection industry, they should make it illegal for a collection agency to sell accounts to another collection agency. You have already been penalized and punished with 7 years of bad credit and collection accounts on your credit. When is enough, enough? Collectors get away with legal extortion.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    Marie – I’ve never encountered this situation before. Did the physician tell your husband that he thought the tests were unnecessary before he ordered them? If so then I suppose the argument could be made that he should have found a different doctor. But if he wasn’t warned of that fact, then perhaps you need to get a consumer law attorney involved to see whether he has any recourse for the credit damage.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    Collectors may call a third party to locate you. They cannot discuss the debt with those people. If they have found you the calls must cease. However, given the fact that you don’t owe this debt and you’ve disputed it. it is entirely possible this collector is breaking the law. You can either contact a consumer law attorney or you can file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

  • Aja

    In 2009 i used my credit card to purchase a phone for $100. After as few days i changed my mind on the phone i wanted and i ended up paying another $100. I have a credit limit of $200 so it didnt bother me. Well after a few days sprint sent me a letter stating i had to pay a co payment…unfortunately i didnt have any money so i can to cancel the order. I was never reimbursed for the cells and they never paid the credit card company back ither. Well now i owe the card company almost $500. What should i do?

    • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

      Aja – Are you saying this happened six years ago? Is it now a collection account? When was the debt charged off? If you do not have your current credit reports please get them so you can see the charge off date. Here’s how to get your free annual credit reports.

      • Aja

        Yes this happen back then. Now the card is in collections and i not only owe the initial $200 but with interest fees for allowing these years it almost $500. I called the card company and they said because it was with collections they couldn’t help me and Wal-Mart also refuses to help me.

        • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

          Check your state statute of limitations. If this debt is too old you can ask them to stop contacting you. Hopefully this article will be helpful:

          Does Your Old Debt Have an Expiration Date?

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team