Home > Credit Cards > The CFPB Announces Its Largest Credit Card Discrimination Settlement Ever

Comments 0 Comments

GE Capital discriminated against consumers who indicated they preferred speaking in Spanish, and deceived customers when selling credit card debt relief products, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alleged on Wednesday. The firm was ordered to pay $225 million to impacted consumers to end two separate enforcement actions brought by the Department of Justice and the CFPB.

The company’s customer service agents communicated with consumers who were late on bills, offering credits or settlement offers, the CFPB said. Some were offered a $25 or $50 credit for making the minimum payment; others were offered a chance to have their balance waived if they paid part of the balance, with offers ranging from 25-55% of what they owed. Spanish speakers were systematically excluded from the offers, the CFPB said.

“GE Capital did not extend these offers to any customer who indicated that they preferred to communicate in Spanish or had a mailing address in Puerto Rico, even if the customer met the promotion’s qualifications,” the CFPB said. “This meant that Hispanic populations were unfairly denied the opportunity to benefit from these promotions. Such discrimination is in direct violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.”

GE Capital did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The CFPB’s order said GE Capital “self-identified and reported” that it had excluded cardholders with “Spanish-preferred” indicators on their accounts. GE had disclosed the probes in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in March.

As part of this settlement, GE Capital was ordered to pay $169 million to 108,000 consumers excluded from the debt relief offers. It’s the largest credit card discrimination settlement in the CFPB’s short history.

“These consumers never knew they were missing out on anything and thus had no way of recognizing that they were even being discriminated against – which is often the challenge in confronting discrimination,” Richard Cordray, CFPB director, said.  “No one should be excluded from credit opportunities simply because of where they live or the language they speak.”

The CFPB also said the firm used unfair sales tactics to trick consumers into signing up for debt protection services with names like “Card Security,” “Account Security,” “Account Security Plus,” and “Debt Security.” The fee-based product promised to cancel consumers’ debts if they ran into financial trouble because of job loss or health problems. Telemarketers led consumers to believe the product was free, the CFPB said. Some also took fees from consumers who were ineligible for debt cancellation, such as those who were already unemployed. GE was ordered to pay $56 million to 638,000 consumers who were “subject to deceptive marketing practices,” the CFPB said.

The news comes just days after GE Capital completed the spinoff off its credit-card-issuing arm, now called Synchrony Financial, with plans to hold an initial public offering soon. GE Capital will still retain 80% ownership of Synchrony.

GE Capital/Synchrony is among the largest credit card issuers in the world, chiefly through retailers’ store-branded cards.  The firm handles credit cards for major retailers like Walmart and Gap, and took in a reported $44 billion in revenues last year.

Current GE Capital/Synchrony consumers impacted by the enforcement action will receive a credit on their bills. Consumers who no longer hold accounts will receive a check in the mail.  GE Capital/Synchrony was also ordered to pay a $3.5 million penalty to the CFPB. The penalty is for the deceptive marketing practices, but not for the discrimination charges because the company self-reported the issue.

This announcement follows a similar settlement between the CFPB and GE Capital in December, when GE agreed to refund $34 million to consumers of its health costs credit card product, GE CareCredit, which was marketed in doctors’ and dentists’ offices around the country. The CFPB accused GE Capital of deceptive marketing around the card; the firm did not admit or deny those allegations.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: luchunyu

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team