Home > 2014 > Personal Finance

Will Mobile Banking Help the Unbanked?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Most people have bank accounts, but 10.5% of the U.S. adult population is considered unbanked, meaning neither they nor their spouse or partner has a checking, savings or money market account. These people may find it difficult or expensive to deposit paychecks, use online payments or get loans.

In a new report, the Federal Reserve identifies mobile banking as a way to potentially increase the unbanked’s access to financial services. That way, they may not have to rely on prepaid cards, which can carry hefty fees, or payday loans, which often carry triple-digit interest rates and frequently lead to cycles of costly debt. Even people with bank accounts often use alternative financial services, including check cashers, pawn shops, auto title loans, prepaid cards and payday lenders. In the Fed report, these consumers are referred to as the underbanked, and they make up 16.9% of the U.S. adult population.

Taking Advantage of Mobile Phones

If the unbanked and underbanked are looking for convenience, mobile financial services could be a helpful option. Of the unbanked, 69% have access to a mobile phone (49% of which are smartphones), and 88% of the underbanked have cellphones (64% are smartphones).

“The relatively high prevalence of mobile phone and smartphone use among younger generations, minorities, and those with low levels of income—groups that are prone to be unbanked or underbanked—makes mobile phones a potential platform for expanding financial access and inclusion,” the report says.

Overall, 87% of U.S. adults have regular access to a cellphone, 61% of which are smartphones.

About a third of underbanked consumers say they have used mobile banking in the last 12 months, meaning they have either accessed their bank account through a mobile Web browser, used a banking application or made a payment with a mobile device.

Among all mobile phone users, the use of mobile banking has climbed during the past few years, and more than half of smartphone users reported using mobile banking in 2013. While the security of such activity remains a top concern among consumers, it seems mobile banking will continue to grow more popular, with the potential to fill the void unbanked and underbanked consumers may feel as a result of their current access to financial services.

Banking Alternatives

But access doesn’t seem to be the primary issue. Of the unbanked consumers surveyed by the Fed, only 1% said they didn’t have an account because banks do not have hours or locations convenient for them. A quarter of respondents said they didn’t have enough money for an account, and 24% said they didn’t want or need an account.

Prepaid cards are the most common type of financial services used as an alternative to banking. Among survey respondents, 22% said they used some type of prepaid card, and 6% said they use payday loans. Prepaid cards offer many of the conveniences of checking accounts, debit cards and credit cards (such as direct deposit, ATM withdrawal and online payments). Cardholders also have to pay fees for a variety of things like having a low balance, reloading the card and making cash withdrawals, depending on the card. Consumer protections on these cards can be limited in comparison to those of credit cards, as well.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: Sebastiaan-Pruis

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team