Personal Finance

Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Why Equal Pay Is Worth Fighting For

Comments 4 Comments

I honestly can’t believe that we’re still arguing over equal pay in 2014.

When I started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn’t hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. Women have made incredible strides since then. But 40 years later, we’re still debating equal pay for equal work.

Women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they’re taking a hit in nearly every occupation. Bloomberg analyzed Census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. In 99.6% of occupations, men get paid more than women. That’s not an accident; that’s discrimination.

The effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. Today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. In Massachusetts, the average woman who collects Social Security will receive about $3,000 less every year compared to a man in a similar position, because benefits are tied to how much people earn when working.

For middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on Mom’s salary as they do on Dad’s, if not more. Women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat.

Women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it’s not easy. Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. Here in the Senate, Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. It would help ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women.

This is a common-sense proposal—no discrimination, no retaliation when women ask how much the guys are getting paid, and basic data that tell us how much men and women are getting paid for key jobs.  Basic protection, basic information – that’s essentially all this bill does. Employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the Paycheck Fairness Act doesn’t touch any of that.

Even while women still earn less than men in 99.6% of occupations, Senate Republicans won’t even let the Senate vote on a bill to help make the workplace a little fairer for women. They just filibustered the Paycheck Fairness Act for a third time, telling women that we don’t need paycheck fairness.

This should be a no-brainer. America’s women are tired of hearing that pay inequality isn’t real. We’re tired of hearing that it is somehow our fault, and we’re ready to fight back.  We are not going to give up on passing the Paycheck Fairness Act to level the playing field for hardworking women in the workplace.

Next, read Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers’ (R-Wash.) op/ed, Equal Pay Is Just the Start.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Fuse

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • ladyfilosopher

    Flatpick: this statistic illustrating lower pay for women holds true over here in EU, as well. Do you have any demonstration to present in your statement or just a desire to believe differently? Just saying it is not true does not hold any validity on its own. Substantiate or find someone who has found facts to support what you say. Hostility holds no authority nor legitimacy.

  • Bandofotters

    The 77 cent lie. Very disappointing to hear a politician distort a simple stat as a symptom.

  • wildhunt

    If women are currently paid equally for their work, then what harm is there in this law? And if they are not, then how can you deny this law? It doesn’t matter whether or not you like a lawmaker, the question is what potential harm does passing the law do vs what potential harm does not passing it do?

  • heavyw8t

    I am trying to think of just ONE situation that I have been where this concept holds true. I worked in IT for a long time before retiring, bouncing from contract to contract, and the job paid what the job paid if the position was held by a man, a woman, or a kangaroo. I am also trying to think of ONE person I know who finds this 77% allegation true. From professional positions to trades to retail to fast food…. the JOB pays what it pay no matter what, so please provide some specifics to prove the 77% hypothesis. What specific positions have a gender based pay scale? This is 2014, not “40 years ago” when you started teaching.

Find out where you stand.
Get your FREE personalized credit report card.

Sign Up Now
X

Start Maximizing Your Credit Today

Credit ScoreGet a FREE personalized credit check-up today.

Get Started - It's Free!