Home > Credit Cards > Bank of America to Refund $727 Million to Customers

Comments 0 Comments

If you’re worried about how you would pay your bills if you lost your job or could no longer work, you may have signed up for a “credit protection” plan offered by your credit card company. And if you were concerned about identity theft, you may have signed up for a service to monitor your credit and protect you from identity theft.

But you may not have received the benefits you expected, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which announced an enforcement action against Bank of America on Wednesday. It ordered the credit card issuer to pay $727 million in relief to consumers for what it described as illegal credit card practices. This is the largest consumer refund of any CFPB enforcement action to date.

Under the agreement, the bank will issue refunds of $268 million to approximately 1.4 million customer accounts in relation to credit protection products, and an additional $459 million in refunds to around 1.9 million customer accounts for identity protection products. Many customers have already received credits to their accounts, says the bank. In addition, Bank of America said in a statement that it stopped marketing identity theft protection products in December 2011 and credit card debt cancellation products in August 2012.

Sold When Consumers Activated Cards

According to the CFPB, these products were largely sold by telemarketers when customers activated their cards, or through outbound telemarketing. Some made misstatements to consumers about the protection they would get. For example, consumers may have been told the first 30 days of coverage was free, when in fact it wasn’t. Instead, customers had 30 days to cancel and receive reimbursement of their fees. Other customers may have been led to believe they were simply requesting additional information about the product when they actually were being enrolled in the program.

One of the products in question was called “Credit Protection Plus” and, according to the consent order, the last version Bank of America offered would cancel up to twice the customer’s minimum monthly payment for up to 18 months for involuntary unemployment, disability,  hospitalization and leave of absence (each as defined in the product’s terms and conditions); up to three minimum monthly payments for certain defined life events, including marriage, divorce, birth/adoption, new residence, graduation, entering college and retirement; and up to $25,000 of the customer’s balance upon the customer’s death. When last marketed to customers, the monthly fee for this product was 0.85% of the customer’s monthly balance.

The other product, “Credit Protection Deluxe” was a service that was last marketed to consumers as one that would, for a flat fee of $15.99 a month, cancel up to up to $500 per month (for a total of up to $2,000) for involuntary unemployment, disability, hospitalization and leave of absence (each as defined in the product’s terms and conditions), and up to $200 for the same life events covered by Credit Protection Plus.

Even if these types of products are marketed properly, consumer advocates generally don’t recommend them because they provide limited coverage at a relatively steep cost. Using the money you would have paid for one of these services to start an emergency savings account or pay down debt is often a better bet.

The other product involved was an identity protection service that helped consumers receive and monitor their credit reports. Delivering that information required the customer’s written consent, but according to the CFPB, some customers were charged before this process was completed, and some customers were charged without ever receiving the promised benefits.

While there are times when it makes sense to pay for a credit monitoring service, there are ways consumers can monitor their credit for free by obtaining their credit reports for free once each year and using a free service like Credit.com to monitor their credit scores each month.

The CFPB says this is the fifth action they have taken against credit add-on products. Previous actions involved products offered by Capital One, Discover, Chase and American Express.

Consumer complaints are one way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau identifies problems it needs to investigate. If you have a problem with a credit card issuer, debt collector, credit reporting agency or student loan servicer that you can’t satisfactorily resolve it yourself, you may want to file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team