Home > Students > A Small Student Lender Trying to Change the Game

Comments 0 Comments

There’s not a lot of love out there for the student loan industry. Sure, they help millions of students who couldn’t otherwise afford it get a college degree, but you’ve no doubt heard a horror story about someone struggling with crippling student loan debt. Some have even called the $1.2 trillion of outstanding education debt in the U.S. the “student loan crisis.”

David Klein definitely sees a problem. When he and Michael Taormina were at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, both needed student loans to pay their way. They noticed two major issues: High fixed-rate financing and an unnecessarily complex and overwhelming loan process.

In 2011, Klein and Taormina, along with Wharton classmate Jessup Shean, founded CommonBond, a student lender offering low-cost loans and refinancing for creditworthy borrowers. 

The program started as a refinancing and loan program for Wharton students. Then they expanded to 25 MBA programs. On March 19, CommonBond announced loan and refinancing expansion to more than 100 graduate programs for business, medical, engineering and law degrees.

CommonBond’s 10-year fixed-rate loan and refinance interest rate is 5.99%, compared to the current 6.41% for a federal direct PLUS loan. As of July 1, 2013, federal loans are tied to the 10-year Treasury note, so next year’s interest rate will be a bit different. (Between 2006 and 2013, when CommonBond was formed, directPLUS loans were 7.9%.) CommonBond has no application fees, origination fees or prepayment penalties, while PLUS loans have a 4.288% origination fee.

Obviously, people earning business, law, engineering and medical degrees have high earning potential — so what about all the undergrads and other students out there battling high education costs?

“We’re getting there,” Klein said. He called it their “Facebook model” — start at one school where they’re familiar with the students’ potential, then continue to expand as they prove their business model works. As they grow, they’re working to address the problems in the student loan industry.

CommonBond also uses a one-for-one model (like TOMS shoes or Warby Parker glasses) to send a student to school for a year for every degree fully funded through CommonBond. They do this work with Pencils of Promise — a nonprofit that builds schools and offers scholarships to students in the developing world.

I asked Klein to identify what he sees as the contributing factors to the huge increase in education debt during the past few years. Here’s what he had to say.

Do you think we’re in the midst of a student loan crisis?

From a financial perspective, I don’t see a crisis. … Student debt as its share of total debt is more than it was before. Clearly that thing is going to get attention. … I tend to reserve the word ‘crisis’ for what we saw in 2008 [with the mortgage industry].

Why aren’t more lenders refinancing student loans?

It was after the financial crisis that a lot of private banks stopped lending altogether to students. It seems as though the banks [that] have removed themselves from the equation have done so because it just isn’t worth it. … The banks that are still in it are charging rates that we think are unnecessary because they’re assigning a certain risk premium to it. We don’t have the same baggage as the banks … because we can build from scratch, having the borrower in mind the whole time. … What we’re able to say is we’re able to price this loan to the credit quality of the borrower we’re underwriting.

What do you feel is driving this spike in student debt?

Student debt is really a reflection of the higher costs of education, and it’s also a reflection of the increased number of people going to school. I think more people going to school is a good thing. But I think there needs to be a more thoughtful conversation on how much [students] should borrow based on what industry you’re going into. That probably needs to happen much more than it is. It turns the conversation less about a problem or a crisis and more about a productive plan on responsible lending and responsible borrowing.

First, the cost of education is well outpacing the pace of salary growth, and if things continue at that rate, it’s unsustainable, and that’s just math. The second piece is what I would call financial literacy. It’s choosing what field you want to study with a very strong understanding of what employment prospects and earning potential are in that field because it’s only then that you can figure out what’s a manageable [level] of debt for you.

More on Student Loans:

Image: calvste

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team