Home > 2014 > Personal Finance

Do You Really Need a Budget?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Personal finance is largely a matter of preference. You don’t need to use a budgeting strategy to manage your money any more than you need a car to get around your city. Some people see it as the easy mode of transportation, while others find the maintenance, insurance and fuel costs a hassle. Whatever you prefer, it’s only important that it works for you.

The Purpose of Budgeting

Not all budgets are the same. Some people allocate their money to very detailed expenses and obey them to the dollar, while others use budgets in a more general sense. It’s really just a plan: You decide where your money is going before you spend it, and the idea is to stick to it.

Budgets are tools people use to reach their goals and make sure they’re spending only what they can afford. You can do those things without pre-determining where you’ll spend your money, but the lack of structure in your finances could make it more challenging to know your progress and adjust any habits that may be detrimental to your financial endgame.

Drawbacks to Budgeting

No one thinks it’s fun to budget. (OK fine, I love budgeting, but I’m a bit nerdy like that, and even I find it frustrating at times.) Putting together a budget presents you with the reality that you may not be able to afford eating out as much as you’d like, or that your monthly clothes-shopping bill needs to go down drastically if you ever expect to retire.

At the same time, some people can get obsessive about their budgets, focusing too much on the plan and forgetting to adapt when necessary. Things like gas prices and electricity bills fluctuate constantly, so your budget needs some flexibility, too.

Setting aside money for the fun stuff is just as important as allocating for the so-called responsible things, because if you don’t permit yourself any fun, you’re more likely to get off track with an impulsive, feel-good purchase you may not need.

Prioritize Value

Financial responsibility doesn’t mean you have to be cheap. In a Reddit discussion thread covering this topic, one poster wrote, “Budgets just don’t sit right with me. I hate the idea of getting something that isn’t good enough just because I didn’t want to pay more.”

This is where the flexibility comes in. If you need to buy something ASAP, you may have to cut back on another adjustable expense to pay for it, if you think a higher-priced option will provide superior quality. Maybe you’ll just have to wait until the next month or two to buy whatever it is, so you can afford the item you really want.

A budget isn’t telling you what you can’t buy. One respondent to the one Redditor’s comment highlighted an important perspective: “You must stop thinking of it as a sacrifice.” Whether you’re categorizing all your planned spending or merely tracking cash flow, the important thing is to live within your means.

A few weeks ago, I overheard two women at the gym talking about spending. One was talking about how she likes using the online budgeting tool Mint, and the other responded: “I used to budget, but I don’t even want to know anymore.”

The other woman then pulled out her phone to show her friend the app and how it breaks down her spending. “That stresses me out,” the non-budgeting woman responded.

So maybe a detailed budget isn’t for everyone, but you don’t want to ignorantly fall into debt, either. No matter how you approach your personal finance, you at least have to make sure you can afford your choices and that you’ll be able to afford them in the future. The rest is really up to you.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Cathy Yeulet

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team