Home > Students > More Reasons Why Your Alma Mater Doesn’t Matter

Comments 0 Comments

Recently, I wrote an article that asked: who cares where you went to college?

It referenced two surveys: one that Gallup and the Lumina Foundation sponsored and the other by the Cooperative Institutional Research Program at UCLA. The Gallup/Lumina survey contrasted the views of 1,102 randomly selected American adults who said that school choice was either very (30%) or somewhat (50%) important for well-paid employment with those of 623 business leaders who said that it was either not at all (14%) or not very (40%) important.

The CIRP study took a different tack. Roughly one-quarter of the college freshmen who were surveyed said that even though they were accepted by their first-choice schools, they chose to attend other colleges and universities instead, mostly (60%) for financial reasons.

As I read through the hundreds of comments that were posted on the different sites that picked up the article, it quickly became clear that I touched a nerve.

Many wrote that school choice did matter, if only for the college graduate’s first—and, possibly—second jobs. Thereafter, most of them believed it all boiled down to the applicant’s inherent capabilities and the skills he or she acquired along the way. There were also those who touted the superior networking attributes of the elite schools as worth the effort and price of admission.

What Ultimately Matters to Employers?

The comment about school choice as a potential influencing factor is fair. No doubt, many employers focus on that for recent graduates who don’t have much else to show on their résumés. So too can an elite school’s superior alumnae network be helpful in finding and landing that first employment opportunity.

Here’s the thing, though.

According to a 2014 Federal Reserve Bank of New York report that draws upon data from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Information Network, the rate of underemployment for recent and slightly older college graduates has been steadily worsening since 2001: on average, 56% for 22-year-olds, 40% for 27-year-olds and 33% for graduates who are in their 30s, when measured between 2009 and 2011.

What’s more, according to a study conducted by Accenture (a consulting company), one third of 2013 college grads who were surveyed said they would be willing to accept the first job offer they receive. In another one, conducted by Experience (a career services firm) soon after the economic collapse, 70% of respondents said that they had already left their first job before two years’ time.

Therefore, if employers are looking to take advantage of a buyer’s market for inexperienced talent by aiming for grads from the better schools, only to have them jump ship soon after, I have to once again ask: how much does school choice really matter?

I say that because young adults are often given a pass for their first (and, perhaps, second jobs) because as those of us who’ve hired staff know from experience, finding the right fit is a process. But candidates with half as many jobs or more as the number of years they’ve been working full time will find themselves at the bottom of the list. That’s because it takes time and costs money to recruit, train and help new hires to become productive.

I don’t know of any employer that would be eager to make that kind of investment for the benefit of its new employee’s next boss.

Choosing Another Path

One more point to add: According to that Accenture survey, 48% of recent college graduates said they would have been more successful had they pursued a different major area of study. The FRBNY report echoes that theme by drawing attention to the fact that candidates who’ve acquired analytical skills—such as in engineering, math and computer sciences—as well as those who majored in education and health fared better than others.

Whatever the educational competency, however, college students would be well served to contemplate alternative applications for the knowledge they’ve worked hard to acquire.

For example, I once met an English major who was working at a Wall Street firm. His job was to write prospectuses for the securities his company was peddling to its investors. When I asked how he’d ended up doing that kind of work in that kind of place, he flashed a broad grin and asked, “Have you ever read the stuff finance guys write?”

More on Student Loans:

Image: tupungato

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team