Home > Identity Theft > 4 Things Your Doctor Doesn’t Need to Know

Comments 1 Comment

Watch an episode of SVU, Law & Order or CSI on TV, and you’re bound to hear about doctor-patient confidentiality in hushed, almost reverent terms. Go to a new doctor’s office and, amidst all the other paperwork, you’ll be asked to sign a form enumerating your federally-mandated medical privacy rights. Call a hospital to check in on a friend and you’re likely to hear that those rights prevent them from connecting your call.

So then why is medical identity theft one of the most common forms of identity theft and growing?

It’s partially because, like many small businesses, doctor’s offices often don’t understand best practices when it comes to protecting the information they keep on their patients, and their record-keeping is often based on antiquated forms and methods of documentation that are long past their prime.

For instance, I recently made an appointment with a new, highly recommended physician whose staff immediately emailed me a new patient information form to fill out… and they suggested that I return it to a Hotmail account! I was dumbfounded that they would even recommend email — which is transmitted in plain text (with a few exceptions) and easily intercepted — to pass along my entire medical history.

Worse yet, most people don’t know how dangerous it is to email this kind of personal information, or that you don’t just have to hand over all the information that a doctor requests. So what are some of the things they ask for that they don’t need to know?

1. Your Social Security Number

It used to be that your Social Security number was also your health insurance ID number (and, for those readers who use Medicare, it still is for the foreseeable future). But the vast majority of health care providers have changed that. So why do doctors still ask you for your SSN? Because the forms still list it, they’re used to asking for it, because “it’s what they’ve always done.” But that’s no reason for you to simply give it up. Leave it blank.

2. Family Members’ Social Security Numbers

If they don’t need your Social, doctors definitely don’t need the SSNs of your minor children or your spouse. The more ways there are to find this information, the easier it is for that information to be lost or stolen, and child identity theft is itself a large and growing problem because their profiles are usually pristine and unlikely to be legally accessed until the age of 17.

A child’s identity can be stolen and used for years before it is ever noticed.  Remember how difficult it was for you to establish good credit when you were just starting out as a recent high school graduate? Now imagine that with years of bad credit to erase, all of which happened while your child was studying algebra.

3. Your Email Address

Yes, it’s quite convenient to communicate via email but, as we’ve all learned from countless health care breach stories in the past year, it’s also a very convenient way for others to eavesdrop on our correspondence or steal our identities.

If you want to keep your medical information private (and you do), then don’t even give the doctor the option to communicate in this way with you. They may set up a secure portal where you can log in to see your test results, but they should never email your test results or other personal health information to you.

4. Any Financial Information Not Used to Pay Your Immediate Bill

There’s absolutely no need for a doctor’s office to keep your credit card on file. If someone in the front office asks if you’d like for them to file this information, politely decline. They may also ask to write your driver’s license number on your check in order to help them collect if your check bounces; ask them if they can use another means of verification (one that isn’t your SSN or other sensitive info).

Doctors are bound by the Hippocratic Oath to first do no harm and while they may be very good, or even the best, at what they do, the continuing parade of breach announcements in the health care area is a clear indication that many haven’t a clue when it comes to information security. All the laws in the world, even the most vigorous enforcement of those laws, cannot supplant our individual responsibility for self-protection. Our identities are our assets and it is incumbent upon each of us to trust less and be covetous of our personal identifying information. Just because someone is trained to save a life doesn’t mean they can’t innocently put it in harm’s way.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Nastco

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Josh

    Mr Levin, you must not be familiar with the Accountable Care Act that requires physicians to establish ways to electronically communicate with patients in order to earn dollars through meaningful use. We do have a secure portal, but the only way it works is with a patient’s e-mail address. It is essential that physician practices collect patient e-mail addresses. In our system, we are able to send a notice to the patient, via e-mail, that they have a secure message in the portal where they can log in and read it. I direct you to the following Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services overview of the meaningful use requirements.

    http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/Stage2_MeaningfulUseSpecSheet_TableContents_EPs.pdf

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team