Home > 2014 > Mortgages

Why Troubled Homeowners Could Face Huge Tax Bills

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

Financial adversity is an unhappy fact of life — jobs are won and lost, savings stashed and spent, and investments gain and lose ground all the time.

Certain reversals of fortune are within our ability to predict and prevent. Indeed, some losses may even be manageable. Others, though, are impossible for some to overcome.

Apparently, lawmakers felt that way when they enacted the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007 — legislation that exempted from personal income taxes the portion of mortgage-related debts that were forgiven by lenders in the aftermath of the crisis.

When the repayment of some or all of a loan obligation is waived — such as in the case of a mortgage short sale or some other type of modification that reduces the unpaid balance of a loan — the IRS views the forgone amount the same as if it were paid as ordinary income. Fully taxable income, that is.

So Congress set out to shield borrowers against the financial perversion that would ensue when debts are forgiven with one hand and taxed with the other. The resulting legislation was originally intended to remain in place through 2012. It was later extended through 2013.

As the New York Times points out in a recent story, however, the financial gotcha that lawmakers sought to head off is now being visited upon consumers who thought they were being helped.

The Downside of Relief

As of Jan. 1, 2014, borrowers are now required to pay taxes on the forgiven values of their mortgage-related debts, just as banks have begun to write them off. The difference, of course, is that consumers are on the “paying” side of the equation while lenders are on the “receiving” end. That’s because of the tax deduction that may be claimed when the write-off is for previously recognized (and taxed) profits and/or diminished loan balances.

That seeming disparity notwithstanding, the discontinuation of the special tax exemption poses serious challenges for financially strapped consumer-borrowers who were granted relief. To start, given their present circumstances, it’s unlikely they have enough extra cash on hand to pay their tax bills in full. It’s equally improbable that they’ll be able to obtain reasonably priced financing, especially if their houses were sold or their mortgages were adjusted downward to their properties’ current market values.

So when paying cash or being approved for a low-rate loan that’s supported by high value collateral isn’t in the cards, borrowers have two choices.

The first would be to search for unsecured financing. The issues, however, are the high rates this type of financing commands, and the stringent terms that may be required if the loan is approved in the first place.

The second would be to borrow from the source of their economic pain: the federal government.

Paying a Big Tax Bill

The IRS offers installment payment plans to consumers who are unable to fully pay their tax obligations when due. In fact, the service relaxed the rules for this accommodation two years ago. As a result, taxpayers now have up to 72 months (six years) to repay their debt. The fees are modest and the rates are low (currently between 3% and 4%).

The key, however, is to always remember which entity it is that you’re borrowing from.

Your remittances must be made on time and in full. Otherwise, the IRS may take enforcement actions that can include the filing of federal tax liens against all your other possessions. Also know that any tax refunds to which you may be entitled in the future will be used to offset your remaining obligation.

Of course, the best approach would be to extend the mortgage forgiveness act during this period of tenuous economic recovery. In fact, while we’re at it, let’s also expand it to cover the portion of student loan debts that are forgiven.

It’s tough to rationalize taxing the relief that the government is advocating for lenders to offer when it is itself the single largest student lender that just so happens to be the single largest grantor of debt-relief as well.

This glaring inconsistency is nothing less than a financial sleight of hand.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: moodboard

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.ovlg.com/ Amy Nickson

    Yes, paying a huge tax bill is indeed a huge problem for someone who is going through tough financial situations and has sought for mortgage debt relief under the debt relief act. Hence, yes it is indeed true that the downsides of the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Act has some strong pitfalls that require being re-structured. This “glaring inconsistency is nothing less than a financial sleight of hand”; indeed it’s true!

  • http://www.ovlg.com/ Amy Nickson

    You’re Welcome Mitchell :)

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team