Home > 2014 > Managing Debt

Should You Ask Your Boss for a Loan?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

As if high-rate, short-term loans don’t mess with enough household budgets, the financial services industry has come up with a new way to mess with even more.

According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, a growing number of nonbank consumer-lending institutions have been busy signing up legions of new borrowers in the most obvious, smack-your-head, why-didn’t-I-come-up-with-that-idea places—where they work.

Think about it. The lenders gain extraordinarily efficient access to scores of eager borrower-wannabes in a single setting while at the same time, significantly diminish the risk of loss because that point of access also happens to be the borrowers’ source of income.

Employers also stand to gain from this arrangement. Not only are they in a position to more easily deflect the often awkward request for a payroll advance, but the employee now has yet another reason to value the job he or she has.

Or not.

Whether they’re called payday, account advance or bill-pay loans, short-term financing comes at a very high price—often several hundred percent APR. And because consumers are, in effect, trading next week’s paycheck for this week’s cash-in-hand, they’re also likely to re-borrow the same amount (if not more) time and again.

Unfortunately, the demand for this product is strong these days, no doubt because roughly three-quarters of U.S. wage earners are living paycheck to paycheck. All the more reason for federal regulators to tighten the rules governing a burgeoning industry sub-segment that’s enjoying strong support from the investment community. Here are my suggestions for regulating these types of loans.

Setting APR-Based Usury Limits

Lenders often devise rate and fee schemes that vary from state to state because usury limits and their underlying calculation methodologies also vary among jurisdictions. This can add to the confusion for borrowers. How about setting a national usury limit that’s expressed as an annual percentage rate? APRs mathematically combine interest rates and fees into a metric that’s easy for consumers to understand and shop.

Choice of Law

Lenders also compare and contrast differing states’ laws and the agencies that would oversee their operations as they go about deciding where to put down roots—even when the business is conducted across state lines. How about designating a set of laws that are universally applied and overseen by a single regulator?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has taken the lead in this regard. One of its most recent actions involves several online financial services companies that, according to the CFPB, are engaged in “unfair, deceptive and abusive” lending practices. Should the bureau successfully prove its case, the implications for these firms would be catastrophic. Not only would the firms be required to pay substantial monetary damages, but the underlying loan contracts would also be voided. That means the borrowers would no longer be obligated to repay those particular debts.

[Offer: Increase your knowledge. Boost your confidence. The Life Happens Course Book by Credit.com Contributor Mitchell D. Weiss is your ticket to a financially savvy future.]

Enhanced Transparency

Last, given this latest innovation—the direct involvement of employers in personal financial matters—how about beefing up the disclosure requirements so that employees can know whether their employers are financially benefitting from the referrals they make and the extent to which their personal financial circumstances are being shared?

No different from any other business, lenders have their own profitability targets to hit. So it stands to reason that any incremental costs—referral fees, in this instance—are likely to be passed on to borrowers in the form of even higher rates than these loan products already fetch.

Finally, as for the matter of sharing confidential financial information, ask yourself this: Do I really want my boss to know that my personal circumstances are such that I’m willing to pay loan shark rates for a quick cash hit?

More on Managing Debt:

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: milan2099

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team