Home > 2014 > Credit Cards

Should Banks Be in the Marijuana Business?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

For many people like me, starting your own business is the embodiment of the American dream – you get to be your own boss, build something from the ground up and revel in its success. But for some budding entrepreneurs in several states their small businesses have become big financial nightmares – and not because of the economy. Rather, the federal government has forced them to go cash-only in an electronic economy despite the fact they sell a legal product (in some states): marijuana.  According to the Federal government, however, it’s still illegal.

If you own a business selling marijuana in a state where it’s legal, even if it’s for medical use, you will have trouble getting a bank loan, accepting credit cards (or getting one for your business), claiming any business expenses on your taxes or even running your proceeds and expenses through many bank accounts. And even if the federal laws prohibiting banks from doing business with people who sell certain substances aren’t exclusively targeting marijuana sellers in states where it is legal, the feds certainly haven’t shied away from targeting legal dispensaries in the recent past based on those very laws.

It’s just another example of the federal government’s willingness to use whatever means at its disposal – in this case, its oversight of financial institutions – to compel its citizens to abide by a certain set of moral codes with which, increasingly, most of its citizens do not agree.

What Americans Say About It

Fully 58% of Americans now believe that marijuana should be legal, according to an October Gallup poll. To be clear, they weren’t asked if “medical marijuana” should be legal, which has long enjoyed majority support, or if marijuana possession should be decriminalized, but whether the drug itself should just be legal. A solid 60% of Americans think that the federal government should stop enforcing federal laws against marijuana in states where it is legal, according to a Pew Research Center Poll that also showed 70% of Americans think the money we spend enforcing marijuana laws isn’t worth it.

Yet, in Colorado and Washington – where residents voted to make marijuana sales and possession wholly legal – proprietors who operate within the law are forced to contend with a situation driven by government policy that makes them less safe, their customers less safe and the state less likely to collect tax revenues on which it is counting – they are, and have to remain, cash-only. That means, for many small business owners, they pay their employees in cash, they pay their taxes in cash and they purchase most of their goods and supplies in cash, all of which leave them more vulnerable to violent crime than the average small business person.

Worse, as some in law enforcement have warned, it leaves the entire system vulnerable to bad actors, who see cash-only businesses as conduits to launder money or cheat the system.

Weak Protections

Meanwhile, Attorney General Eric Holder said last week that the department is preparing “legal guidance” for prosecutors and law enforcement in an effort to clarify how these businesses should be able to access the banking system. This doesn’t mean that the guidance will necessarily mean an “all’s clear” for legal dispensaries. The federal government issued a similar guidance in 2009 that was then ignored by law enforcement when raiding the very shops the guidance was expected to protect. The guidance, Politico noted when it was issued, “wouldn’t be enforceable in court and would amount to less than the kind of clear safe harbor many banks say they would want before accepting money from pot businesses.”

It’s time to stop this nonsense. The voters of Colorado and Washington believe marijuana should be legal, and medical marijuana is legal in another 18 states and the District of Columbia. Even my home state of New York is launching a medical marijuana trial program. The last three Presidents have used it, most of our Congressional leaders have tried it and we’re increasingly unlikely to have another president who can even claim that he (or she) didn’t inhale.

So there’s no reason for the small business owners to bear the brunt of the federal government’s desire to enforce a marijuana prohibition law its own people don’t support and many states have thrown out – and there’s even less reason to make the men and women employed by the private banks and credit card companies the de facto enforcers of that law. If it’s going to be legal, small business owners who sell it should have the same access to the financial system (and the protections that system provides them) as any other small business owner in America.

The only way to make the system safe, secure, easy to monitor and taxable is to make it like every other business in the eyes of the (federal) law and the banks that can help it grow.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: Eldad Carin

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team