Home > 2013 > Personal Finance

Is a Peer-to-Peer Loan Right for Your Small Business?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

If you own a small business, it may come as no surprise that bank loans are tougher to come by. However, other avenues for small business financing are opening up.

Last month, the largest peer-to-peer (P2P) lenders, Lending Club and Prosper, originated more than $280 million in loans. The increased popularity of P2P/online consumer lending has been well-documented; P2P lending expert Peter Renton with Lend Academy estimates that these platforms have issued more than $3.4 billion in mostly personal loans since 2006.

The next natural step for the industry? Extension to the small business sector. As banks maintain a tight hold on cash, P2P offers fast and convenient access to capital for qualified small business owners.

In the current landscape, P2P has emerged as a solid middle ground for small businesses seeking an alternative to credit cards and the pricier merchant cash advance, though even these expensive financing options have dramatically increased in popularity as well.

This expansion of P2P into small business lending represents a natural progression for the industry, given lending trends since even before the Great Recession. As the Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank has reported, bank lending to small businesses has been on a downward spiral since the late ’90s.

The success of Lending Club and Prosper has established a foundation of credibility for borrowers and lenders alike. Restricted lending by banks during the recession due to fewer creditworthy companies is a direct contributor to the rise of these platforms, and alternative lending in general. Since the demand for capital is strong, industry experts anticipate small business owners will gravitate to P2P in pursuit of short-term cash infusions.

Greater Access for Small Business Owners

The development of evolving technologies aimed at the evaluation of potential borrowers has facilitated the rise of small business P2P loans as well. Access to Big Data, and the development of refined computer algorithms, enables online lending platforms to identify viable applicants within minutes.

QuarterSpot, a small business P2P lender, has built its platform around precisely this type of technology. As CEO Adam Cohen explains, his company utilizes a complex formula that targets highly specific criteria, searches out red flags and ultimately evaluates loan applications efficiently and cost-effectively.

Actually, the word “application” is being used very loosely here. One of the touted benefits of P2P small business lending is that it requires very little paperwork. Working from five basic pieces of information, QuarterSpot obtains credit reports and bank transaction histories for potential borrowers. Businesses that meet the established criteria can have loans processed immediately. You don’t need to put up a house, car or personal savings in order to secure the transaction. In some cases, approved applicants may have fresh capital in hand within 24 hours.

As for the rates, QuarterSpot, for example, offers some good options, particularly in comparison to merchant cash advances. Whereas the latter require payment on full principal, QuarterSpot’s amortized loans break payments down into smaller chunks, including daily segments. This means that as the loan is paid down, interest is paid on the reduced amount as opposed to the original principal. Considering that online small business loans generally offer better interest rates than merchant cash advances to begin with, amortization only sweetens the deal.

How P2P Sees Small Businesses

The trends that led to the expansion of P2P/online lending into the small business sector are further reflected in the success of IOU Central. As CEO Phil Marleau points out, the emphasis on technology is a driving factor in the rapid growth of his company. IOU Central’s underwriting model was years in the making, encompassing everything from credit scores and bank records to social media feedback and street views of business locations. With 15% to 20% of applicants receiving loans and a default rate under 5%, the system seems to be working.

Marleau emphasizes that P2P lenders are much more nimble than traditional banks. Whereas banks are notorious for their bias against certain types of businesses like restaurants or motels, IOU Central, for example, bases their decisions on a different set of criteria. They do not evaluate industries, but evaluate individual businesses on merit. Unlike other points on the lending spectrum, such as factoring companies, they are invested in the success of the businesses they lend to. This dynamic serves to increase the flow of small business borrowers towards P2P lenders.

Even the banks themselves seem to be acknowledging the entrance of companies like IOU Central and QuarterSpot into the small business-lending sector. As Marleau indicates, banks are often reluctant to do the kind of microanalysis necessary to evaluate certain types of small business applications. In such cases, rather than alienate a potential future customer, banks will actually refer them along to P2P lenders who might be more likely to meet their needs.

With this type of collaborative relationship emerging in conjunction with a slew of other economic developments, P2P may continue to grow as a viable financing option for more small businesses.

Image: diego cervo

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team