Home > Personal Loans > Online Payday Lenders Face Scrutiny in New York

Comments 0 Comments

Websites that offer short-term, high-interest loans to consumers continue to draw the attention of regulators, with New York state authorities issuing 16 subpoenas to lead generation websites recently, according to the New York Times.

The relatively new practice of offering payday loans online through websites involves a thicket of complicated legal issues.

Many states have made certain kinds of short-term loans illegal, pushing lenders online, where they can try to act beyond the reach of state authorities. Also, some of those lenders also are affiliated with Native American tribes, and claim they are not subject to U.S. federal consumer protection laws.

State and federal officials have countered these steps by acting to cut off online payday lenders’ access to consumers’ traditional bank accounts, which are easier to regulate. In most cases, payday lenders receive payments by tapping directly into consumers’ checking accounts.

Critics of payday loans say many consumers get trapped in cycles of repeatedly taking out new loans to repay the old, effectively being hit with 300%- 1,000% interest rates. Supporters say short-term loans provide access to cash for a set of consumers who can’t easily borrow from the traditional lending industry, and don’t have credit cards.

New York officials who want to stop state residents from acquiring payday loans online — payday stores are illegal in the state — are now targeting “lead generation” websites that promise to help consumers get hundreds of dollars deposited into their checking accounts within minutes.  The 16 subpoenas from financial regulator Benjamin Lawsky were sent to websites sites that act as middle-men, collecting consumers’ personal information and passing it on to lenders for a commission. They seek information on the lenders the online lead generators work with, the Times reported.

Legal Issues Abound

There’s been a flurry of legal action surrounding payday loans in recent months.

In September, South Dakota-based Western Sky lending suspended operations after what it calls “unwarranted overreach by state regulators,” including New York.  Western Sky, once a fixture in late-night television advertising, said it had to lay off 94 employees in its Cheyenne River Indian Reservation operation after state regulators pressured banks to stop working with them, “choking off business with online lenders like Western Sky.”

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced its first payday loan enforcement action Nov. 20, with Cash America International reimbursing 14,000 consumers up to $14 million for robo-signing practices connected to debt collection lawsuits.

This summer, the Federal Trade Commission won a finding from a federal judge in Nevada that reservation-based payday lenders are not exempt from U.S. consumer protection law — specifically, the FTC Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

Meanwhile, the Online Lenders Alliance (OLA), a trade group that represents the industry, has argued that its loans are legal, and traditional banks should not cut off their access to electronic payments. The OLA also said in a statement via spokesman Peter Barden that the group strives to make sure lead generation doesn’t run afoul of the law.

“OLA has strict advertising and marketing best practices for members who offer lead generation for lenders,” Barden said. “They require that consumer data be protected and shared only in compliance with applicable laws.”

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team