Home > Credit Cards > Discover Cardholders May See $8.7M Class Action Settlement

Comments 0 Comments

A U.S. District Court in California has preliminarily approved an $8.7 million class action settlement stemming from a lawsuit against Discover Financial Services for alleged robocalling practices.

Consumers who may be entitled to a payment have been receiving notice of the settlement and must file a claim or opt out by early next year. The claims administrator has been sending customers postcards and emails with instructions for participating (or not) in the settlement, in addition to publishing notices of the settlement through various media outlets.

The initial complaint alleges each member of the class — described as Discover account holders who did not consent to but received automated phone calls between Nov. 30, 2007 and Sept. 10, 2013 — would be entitled to $1,500 in damages if the plaintiffs win the case. Under the terms of the settlement, however, class members would be eligible for between $20 and $40, attorneys have estimated.

In the case, Andrew Steinfeld v. Discover Financial Services, et al., the claimant alleges Discover violated an aspect of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using an automated telephone-dialing system or making prerecorded phone calls to people who had not opted into receiving the calls.

“Congress considered automated calls without prior express consent an invasion of privacy and a nuisance,” said Daniel Hutchinson, a partner at Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and an attorney on the case. “The penalty is designed to recognize that this is a violation of your rights.”

According to court papers, the lawsuit came about after Steinfeld, a California resident, opened a Discover credit card in January 2011. “Beginning in or around December 2011, Discover repeatedly contacted Plaintiff Steinfeld on his cellular telephone. Plaintiff received repeated, harassing calls at all hours of the day. Because these calls were prerecorded, Plaintiff had no ability to request that the calls end or to voice his complaints to a real person,” the lawsuit filing says.

Walter Bradley, another plaintiff and California resident, reported at least 25 calls made by an automated dialing system.

“Discover does not comment on pending litigation,” a Discover spokesman said via email. “That case has received only preliminary approval from the court.”

Initially, the plaintiffs filed the complaint in federal court, and Discover responded with a motion to compel arbitration — with those briefs pending, the parties decided to put the trial on hold and enter mediation with a federal judge. That’s when they arrived at the proposed settlement, which a judge has yet to give final approval.

The settlement find will provide for $2.175 million in attorneys’ fees and costs, and $2,000 in service awards to the two representative plaintiffs.

Potentially affected consumers — several million of them, though the exact number isn’t known — have until Feb. 25, 2014, to file a claim. Those who want to opt out of the settlement must send a request for exclusion to the claims administrator by Jan. 13, 2014, according to a notice received by a Discover customer. The toll-free contact number for the administrator is 1-800-248-1796.

The administrator will work with those who decided to participate to distribute the settlement, if it gets final court approval.

Image: Karen Roach

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team