Home > 2013 > Managing Debt

Why Debt Collectors Need New Rules

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

What consumer protection law is about as old as the arcade game Pong and nearly as antiquated?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — the law that governs what’s become a multi-billion-dollar financial industry segment made up of companies that chase past-due debts from an estimated one in 10 Americans.

When the FDCPA was put into place nearly four decades ago, there were none of the technological conveniences we take for granted today: smartphones, personal computers, the Internet, social media and the like.

All this comes into play with the sophisticated business of tracking down and collecting past-due loan obligations from consumers who are unable (or unwilling) to honor them. These modern day marvels have also opened the door to abuses that the framers of the FDCPA never contemplated.

Modern Problems

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, roughly one-third of the complaints it receives pertain to debt-collection-related matters involving after work hours phone calls, texts and email messages, and inappropriate social media postings. Consumers are also being harassed by incorrect account information and wrongful assertions of indebtedness. Some may not even know they’re being pursued until they read their personal credit bureau report.

Part of the reason for this is that consumer loans have become a currency of sorts. Some creditors sell the loans they originate to other lenders, many outsource their day-to-day management and still more pitch severely delinquent and defaulted loans to liquidation firms for pennies on the dollar even when the borrowers remain obligated for the full amount.

The CFPB believes the time has come to develop a national standard within the context of a modernized FDCPA — one that not only governs companies to which loans are outsourced or sold outright, but also for lenders that retain and service the loans they make (entities that are not at this time subject to the law).

There’s also the matter of medical and municipal debts (e.g. tickets, fines, and so forth), which, as the Bureau points out, aren’t treated the same way as loan-related obligations. And how about evolving a set of rules for the minimum level of required information to be conveyed to the debt collector when a loan is outsourced or sold? I’m talking about giving direct access to the underlying contracts, original credit files and system-generated reports that detail payment histories, customer-service inquiries and prior collections efforts.

I don’t know how any subcontracting loan servicer can think of undertaking an assignment without this fundamentally important background information. In fact, I would take this a step further by recommending that all the participating parties (creditors, servicers and liquidation firms) be held financially responsible for mistakes that result in financial hardships for consumers who are then forced to miss work and engage legal representation in order to untangle a mess they had no part in creating.

[Offer: Increase your knowledge. Boost your confidence. The Life Happens Course Book by Credit.com Contributor Mitchell D. Weiss is your ticket to a financially savvy future.]

Student Loan Relief

Finally, I’d also like to see the FDCPA broadened to protect student loan borrowers that are the victims of a different type of abuse—the sin of omission.

I’m talking about servicers that fail to inform cash-strapped debtors about the relief programs for which they may be eligible, and shunt them instead into negatively amortizing forbearances and other arrangements that prolong the pain while perpetuating the flow of interest and fees.

To be clear, the FDCPA is by no means an escape hatch through which debt-dodgers can slip unnoticed. The point, however, is for creditors, the servicers they engage and the liquidation firms that become involved to fairly collect what they are legitimately owed from consumer-borrowers who, by and large, are decent folks who want to pay their bills.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: Getty Images

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    This is odd…as to why, my only guess is there was some kind of transfer of the debt that resulted in the update. Or it is a mistake. Either way, it sounds like it should come off your report within the next year. (Collection accounts may be reported for 7 years and 180 days from the date you first fell behind with the original creditor.)

    If you don’t want to wait for it to just come off, my suggestion is you complain to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

    This is quite old information so it is possible that it’s not having as significant an impact as you may think on your scores. Still, if it is inaccurate you want to get it removed. So my suggestion is to try the CFPB and let us know what happens!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team