Home > Personal Finance > The Future of Mobile Banking: Starbucks or Google?

Comments 0 Comments

Spanish bank Banco Sabadell announced last month that it was the first financial institution in the world to release a banking app for Google Glass. Months earlier, a Ukrainian bank demoed its Glass app. Analysts are predicting that here in the States, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Fidelity are all toying with the idea.

And I do mean toying.

Google Glass bank apps were all the talk at a recent Las Vegas conference devoted to payment technologies.  Like so many other wearable computing devices and their whiz-bangy apps before them, Glass banking will provide a lot more whiz and a lot less bang for the buck. While providing excellent press release fodder by aligning with a cool Google product, there aren’t many real new use cases for banking with Google Glass. They will be toys. As described, the apps would let consumers take a picture of a check and deposit it (as with a smartphone), conduct banking transactions without stopping by a bank (as with a smartphone) and let people find nearby ATMs with GPS aid (as with a smartphone). Do you sense a theme?

Understandably, banks and retailers — all who worry about collecting money — are very concerned about the arrival of new payment systems. That’s for good reason: mobile payments (as in, cellphone payments) will be a $235 billion business worldwide in 2013, a whopping 44% increase from last year, according to research firm Gartner. Most folks expect it to be a trillion-dollar business relatively soon, sending shockwaves through the $7 trillion business that is credit card transactions.

Keeping It Simple

You can understand why no one wants to miss the boat on the next way to pay for things.  But while distracted by glitz, many in the payments world (and many consumers) may be missing the quiet success of Starbucks and its relatively old-fashioned new payments system — the Starbucks loyalty card app.

Starbucks announced Oct. 30 that fully 11% of its transactions in the U.S. and Canada are being paid through the mobile version of its Starbucks card. About 4 million cups of coffee and crumb buns are purchased every week by a consumer who flashes their smartphone in front of a reader at the cash register. The Starbucks app is simple: it keeps track of balances, it offers some loyalty benefits. But really, to consumers, it’s just a digital picture of an old-fashioned plastic loyalty card. It is, however, elegantly simple and familiar. It takes up no space in their wallets. It fits into their lives. And, most important, they trust Starbucks.

Most important for Starbucks — every time a consumer flashes that Starbucks card, Howard Schultz gets angel wings…and Starbucks avoids paying a pricey interchange fee to a bank.

Perhaps some day, we will all walk around with some kind of heads-up display attached to our heads, a la Google Glass, or even attached to our eyeballs. Then, it will be important for banks to have heads-up display apps that help me find the nearest ATM. Until then, if I were a bank, I’d be more worried about Starbucks than Google Glass.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: Antonio Zugaldia, via Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team