Home > 2013 > Personal Finance

3 New Bank Fees That May Be Coming

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

At a recent discussion among industry experts about the future of mobile banking, fees were a controversial topic. These experts offered several potential business models that could drive the digital banking industry, including a few that would cost consumers.

The Digital Management, Inc. (DMI) VIP Think Tank, as the discussion was called, took place at Worldwide Business Research’s NetFinance 2013 conference among 17 executives from a variety of banks and financial services companies. A report about the discussion summarizes some ideas the executives kicked around, however there are no policy changes to worry about yet. Notably, the paper highlighted a divide, in which there was no consensus about whether fees for mobile banking would lead to success or backlash.

1. Pay As You Go

One of the possibilities include a revenue structure in which consumers would pay for the mobile banking services as they use them, much like the fees adopted by airlines.

Here’s how one participant phrased it (the report identifies members of the VIP Think Tank but does not directly attribute quotes):

“When an airline does something that creates revenue, rather than pointing at that airline and bringing it down, the other airlines say, ‘This is smart, let’s do the same thing,’” stated one participant. “In the financial services business, we need to take the same approach.”

This concept turns a banking service into a transaction: paying to deposit a check, transfer money or set up a bill payment, for example. The think tank debated whether such fee structures would include all mobile banking actions or a combination of fee and free services.

2. Flat Fees

Think of it as the Netflix approach to banking: You could pay a monthly fee to be able to use mobile banking services, or you forgo those options and commit to going out to a video rental store every time you want to watch a movie or TV show. In other words, Netflix is to mobile banking as the video rental store is to bank branches.

In the words of an executive:

“We did a survey a few years ago with bill pay. Instead of paying per transaction, we asked, ‘What if we had a flat rate to pay and customers would never be late on bills. We will do same day bill pay, $9.95 per month.’ Almost everyone who was surveyed said yes because that solved a problem they had and is a fair value and means they don’t have to worry about same day payment, or whether they’ve scheduled it properly, etc.”

While something like that could help consumers who struggle to pay bills on time, consumers who have no trouble paying their bills on time and enjoy the convenience of doing so using their mobile device would likely not enjoy having to pay for that habit.

3. Rewards for the Loyal

Loyalty programs are everywhere, including banks. Consumers see it in checking and savings accounts which may include monthly fees, unless the consumer has a direct deposit or monthly transfer into the account.

There weren’t many specifics in the paper about models for rewards programs, but you can think of it in terms of airline and coffee shop loyalty programs: If you primarily use one company for all your flying/caffeine needs, they will give you discounts and free things:

“One thing that is pretty reasonable that we came up with is when you have fees, it becomes valuable to be a loyal customer,” added another. “With [my airline] I see the value I get as a member. When I fly, my bags are free vs. on other airlines where I pay. Like a flat rate, you are a premier customer; you don’t pay for any of this. Likewise, it’s worth bringing the rest of my money to my bank so I can be a premier customer.”

Other Observations

The paper pointed out several challenges beyond fees as the industry looks toward its future on mobile devices, including overall mobile strategy, other revenue models, customer loyalty and multi-platform functionality.

As far as fees are concerned, the think tank participants voiced their opinions in a poll. The question: “How soon will the market and consumer be ready for institutions to initiate charging premiums for value-added digital services?”

Three-quarters of the participants saw fees in the future of mobile banking: 37% said the market and consumers would be ready in 6 months, 19% said 12 months, 19% said two years or more and 25% said never.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team