Home > 2013 > Mortgages

Study: 1 in 5 Mortgages Won’t Qualify for Safe Harbor Under Dodd-Frank

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

An analysis of home loans showed that one in five current mortgages would not meet the qualified mortgage safe harbor standard that goes into effect in January. Financial risk-management company ComplianceEase released a study highlighting the likely impact of the qualified mortgage (QM) rule on the industry.

The QM rule will require lenders “to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ability to repay any consumer credit transaction secured by a dwelling,” according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The rule also says that lenders who issue mortgages meeting the QM criteria have safe harbor, meaning they cannot be sued by borrowers claiming the loan terms are unfair.

There are four types of qualified mortgages under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, but in general, they preclude any of the following features: upfront fees or points greater than 3% of the loan, negative amortization, interest-only periods, loan terms longer than 30 years and ballooning principals. A borrower’s debt-to-income ratio must be 43% or lower, and the mortgage rate needs to be close to the national average prime mortgage rate (within 1.5 percentage points for first-lien loans and within 3.5 percentage points for subordinate-lien loans). A loan with a higher interest rate makes it a higher-priced mortgage.

Of the one in five mortgages originated today that don’t meet the new QM standards, more than half of them have fees in excess of the 3% limit, and they exceed that limit by about $1,500. The rest of the loans that fall short do so because the mortgage rates are too high.

“Based on current guidelines, these loans also will not be eligible for purchase, insurance or guarantee by government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) or government agencies,” said the news release announcing the company’s analysis.

What the New Rule Means for Borrowers

Under a provision in the Dodd-Frank Act, lenders must verify a mortgage applicant’s ability to repay the loan. Issuing a QM fulfills the ability to repay requirement, which is met by the lender confirming eight aspects of the borrower’s finances with third parties: current or reasonably expected income or assets; employment status; monthly mortgage payment; monthly payments on simultaneous loans; monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; other debt obligations, alimony and child support; debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and credit history.

The new QM thresholds take effect Jan. 10, 2014, which will not only impact lenders’ liability, but also consumers’ ability to qualify for home loans. The new standards are intended to protect consumers from practices that spurred the financial crisis, and while it may be more challenging for those with poor credit to qualify for mortgages, there are steps consumers can take to improve their chances.

Paying down debts will improve an individual’s debt-to-income ratio and raise credit scores as a result. Credit history is a key component of a loan application, and consumers can get a better sense of their credit standing by reviewing their free annual credit report, and checking their credit scores using free online tools (such as Credit.com’s free Credit Report Card).

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team