Home > 2013 > Personal Finance

Strategies to Get the Best Customer Service

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

There are dozens of strategies consumers employ to get what they want out of companies’ customer service, and public complaining on social media has gotten quite popular recently.

But raging on social media is not the most effective way to use customer service; at least, customers are more satisfied when they use phone calls, chat services, web forms or email. According to the third-quarter Zendesk Benchmark, which analyzes customer satisfaction, businesses provide the best customer service through more traditional channels.

Part of that is because both consumers and companies haven’t quite figured out the social-media method of customer service, said Sam Boonin, the benchmark expert from Zendesk. Supporting someone in public is different than a one-on-one conversation or email exchange, making the matter more complicated.

“I think they’re learning very quickly that social support is important,” Boonin said of customer service providers.

The Secrets to Better Customer Service

Zendesk, a customer-support software company, introduced the benchmark in March 2012 as a way for companies to see how their support performance compares among their peers. The benchmark data comes from “actual support and customer service interactions from more than 16,000 companies across 125 countries that have chosen to participate,” according to the report.

Voice interactions (i.e. telephone conversations) had the highest customer service ranking at 91% satisfaction. Chat platforms came second at 85%, followed by help center/web form (83%), email (82%) and Twitter (81%). Facebook was last with a 74% satisfaction rate.

The time of day customers sought support was much more indicative of satisfaction than method. For consumers in need of help, it’s best to start early in the day.

“5 p.m. is probably the worst time to contact a support organization,” Boonin said. A large part of that is tied to the way organizations staff their support teams, he said, because while large companies may have a 24/7 operation, most others work on a typical work schedule: eight hours a day, five days a week.

Fast responses to customer inquiries drive satisfaction and loyalty, Boonin said, and if a consumer submits a complaint at the end of the day, they’re putting their problems at the bottom of a pile that has been growing all day.

It’s important to remember that support teams are made up of humans, who tend to knock out the easy stuff early and leave harder problems for later, contributing to backlog, Boonin said.

The best times to reach out to customer service are between 8 a.m. and noon, when the average first response — across all platforms — comes within about 5 hours of the inquiry. Keep in mind the various expectations among platforms: Response rates among phone calls, social media and emails are very different. Also, it’s 8 a.m. to noon wherever the support team is, not necessarily 8 a.m. to noon your time.

Boonin said the satisfaction among emerging support platforms is likely to change over time, but for now, consumers with complaints should start early with a phone call for the best shot at a good experience.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team