Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

The Survivor’s Guide to Social Media Privacy Changes

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

There’s been a series of important changes to privacy settings at all the major social networks in the past week. Here’s how they impact you, and what settings you need to review with care.


It’s now much easier for a stranger to send you a direct message, or DM, Twitter’s version of a private message. The bad news: Many scams and viruses are spread through direct message, so this would seem to open users up to more attacks. The good news: Twitter, by default, left well enough alone. If you do nothing, other Twitter users still will have to get you to follow them before they can DM you. Those who like the idea of being contacted in private by strangers — such as journalists — should consider taking advantage of the new option, but most other users should simply double check and make sure the option is unselected.

What to do

Go to the settings page on Twitter and make sure the box next to “Receive direct messages from any follower” is unchecked.


If you check that box, expect more spam, and don’t click on any links sent to you that are unexpected. That means links sent by friends, too. Many Twitter users are infected when their friends’ infected accounts are used to send believable-enough sounding direct messages, such as “You are in this link!”


The search engine behemoth is following in the footsteps of Facebook’s controversial “sponsored stories” feature and allowing advertisers to use members’ names and faces next to certain kinds of ads. If you don’t want this to occur, you have to take action. To learn more about what Google is doing, read the firm’s explanation.

What to do

Unless you want your name and face used in ads, visit Google’s Shared Endorsement page, scroll to the bottom, and uncheck the box that says “Based upon my activity, Google may show my name and profile photo in shared endorsements that appear in ads.”


If you haven’t signed up for any Google Plus services, you may not see an option to check/uncheck. Google is making it harder and harder to use its site and tools without signing up, however, so if you aren’t sure, check the shared endorsement page


The social media network announced last week it was following through on a threat to remove a privacy option that allowed users to prevent strangers from finding their profile using the service. Facebook says the option was rendered moot by other changes that make all kinds of items, like status updates, more searchable. If you are a privacy-conscious user, it should unnerve you.

What to do

You can’t restore what Facebook has taken away. But you can do a few things to minimize the impact.

First: You can still block individual users from finding you, but you must do this proactively.

Second: Revisit the rest of your privacy settings to see exactly what a stranger would see if he or she found your page. Use Facebook’s “View As…” to do this. Even better — ask a real-world friend who is not a Facebook friend (yes, they do exist) to find you, and see what they can see. If you see something you don’t want to share, adjust your profile’s “basic info” settings.

Third: Make sure to stop search engines from linking to items on your Facebook page. Under privacy settings, and “Who can look me up?” — turn off the options available.


If the idea of losing the ability to stop random strangers from finding your profile bothers you, try this step: Remove your face from your profile picture. Change it to something abstract, such as a landscape picture. That way, unless your name is very unique, a stranger who finds a link to your profile won’t know it’s you.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team