Home > Mortgages > Real Haunted Houses: What Owners Need to Know

Comments 2 Comments

Growing up in a large house that was more than 100 years old, complete with a creepy unfinished basement that I thought looked like it came straight out of a horror film, I had no trouble imagining our house was haunted. But in reality, nothing very unusual happened there — unless you count the bat I almost ran into one night in the basement.

It was when babysitting for someone else, in their very old home, that I experienced what I was certain was an encounter with the supernatural. I had put the children to bed and was reading in the living room when I heard very distinct noises in the room above me. At night. When the room was empty.

It frightened me enough to call the owners. They sent over their parents, who came and inspected the upstairs floor but didn’t find anything amiss. I was embarrassed, but remained convinced that I had heard something.

Years later, I mentioned that incident to one of the home’s current owners. I expected we’d share a laugh about my overactive teenage imagination. But instead, she started rattling off her weird experiences in the home. “It’s haunted,” she said, unfazed.

For me, the thought of living in a “haunted” house is creepy. But for others, there’s a certain appeal. In fact, some 62% of 1,400 consumers surveyed by Realtor.com said they would be open to buying a haunted home.

What if you are the one who owns a house like this, though? Do you have to reveal the unusual things you’ve experienced if you decide to rent or sell the home?

“The idea of a property being haunted often times is considered one’s perception,” says Leslie Piper, Realtor.com’s housing specialist. “If a seller has been informed by a previous owner that a home is haunted or if it is common knowledge, and it could affect the home’s value, then it should be disclosed.” She notes that law regarding these disclosures vary from state to state, adding:

Most states require that deaths or murders be disclosed as well as the time frame of when the incident occurred. In some states, it is recommended that even stories considered as hearsay should be mentioned in disclosures. If a seller truly believes to have witnessed a ghost, levitating objects or other unusual activities on the property, and it could influence a buyer’s decision, then a seller should mention it as a courtesy.

Disclosing Deaths?

One family I know rented a home for a year, and during that time, witnessed a number of strange incidents. They never truly felt comfortable there, even though the home was spacious and beautiful. Only as they were moving out did they learn from a neighbor that a child had drowned in the pool years before.

Should they have been told about that before they moved in? Probably.

“A landlord should inform a potential tenant if a murder or death has occurred on the property,” says Piper. “As for circumstances surrounding possible hearsay, a landlord should use their best discretion if it would impact one’s opinions of renting the property.” But again, any requirements to disclose that fact would be a matter of state law.

What Scares Off Buyers?

As for what will scare off a potential buyer or renter, the Realtor.com survey found the following frightening experiences would stop someone from buying a home:

  • 75%: levitating objects
  • 63%: objects being moved from where they were placed
  • 63%: ghost sightings
  • 61%: supernatural sensations
  • 61%: flickering lights/appliances
  • 60%: strange noises (footsteps, doors slamming)
  • 34%: warm or cold spots

Have you ever lived in a house you believed was haunted? How did you handle it? Share your story in the comments below.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team