Home > Identity Theft > Can You ‘Reclaim Your Name’?

Comments 0 Comments

Feel like you’ve lost control of your identity and personal information? The “Reclaim Your Name” initiative aims to win control back for you.

Reclaim Your Name is the brainchild of FTC Commissioner Julie Brill, who ventured into the belly of the Beast on Monday — AdAge.com — to make a case for more consumer control over Big Data.

“Data brokers, marketers and other companies that join the big-data stampede while ignoring basic privacy principles do so at their own peril,” she wrote. “Brushing … principles aside has led some companies to adopt a ‘collect first, ask questions later’ approach to personal data.”

Brill announced Reclaim Your Name earlier this year, during the height of the NSA eavesdropping scandal. Her point: Government monitoring might sound alarming, but for most Americans, corporate monitoring is a much more real possibility.

Reclaim Your Name calls on the data collection industry to make it easy for consumers to find out what information data hoarding firms have, and to fix any errors. Brill envisions a web portal, one-stop-shop for finding data and correcting mistakes. Already, we’ve seen some steps on this direction: earlier this year, data broker Acxiom unveiled AboutTheData.com, which lets consumers get a sense of the billions of pieces of data Acxiom houses on its servers.

Putting the Burden on Consumers

Reclaim Your Name is a good start but falls short of a similar effort in Europe known as “The Right to Be Forgotten.”

European lawmakers have been considering the simplest of privacy proposals for the past two years:  legislation that would allow consumers to tell firms they must “forget” everything they know about them.

After years of negotiations, a European Parliament committee last week recommended an update to EU data privacy laws that would include a more precisely-named “right to the erasure of data.” The rules also give consumers the right to change their minds after they give a company like Facebook authority to profit from use of data. The new rules would require firms to make withdrawal of consent as easy as giving consent.

Brill’s Reclaim Your Name effort, while an excellent start, is a half-measure when compared to Europe’s proposal. It does require firms to make it easy for a consumer to object to misinformation; that’s good. However, it all but concedes that a long list of firms consumers have never heard of have the right to profit from buying and selling personal information.

Reclaim Your Name would put the burden of reclaiming on consumers, who would have to visit the imagined clearinghouse site to fix errors and grasp the extent of corporate monitoring. Behaviorists would rightly predict only a tiny fraction of consumers might bother to do so.

Tracking the Source of Mistakes

Privacy law expert Anita Ramasastry, of the University of Washington, raised another potential shortcoming of the U.S. effort in a recent column. Will consumers victimized by mistakes be able to get to the bottom of the error, or be sentenced to the digital wild goose chase already familiar to many victims of inaccuracy?

“Would data brokers have a duty to reveal how they obtained data—which source they purchased it from, or what database it comes from?” she wrote. “Tagging and coding the origins of data is crucial if consumers are going to have any hope of being able to pursue information trails and figure out how mistakes on their credit report got made.”

Of course, the elephant in the server room is the appearance of mistakes in the first place.  Everyone and their (sometimes incorrectly identified) family members have shown that data broker databases are riddled with errors. The FTC showed it last year. I showed it by using AboutTheData.com

It would be a tragedy of Orwellian proportions if all a Reclaim Your Name portal accomplished was to enlist consumers in a massive free crowdsourcing effort to fix bad Big Data for data brokerage firms. Brill talks about increasing consumer choice in her proposal, but unless that choice includes something similar to a right to be forgotten, and unless the burden is on the industry — not consumers — to make those preferences clear, Reclaim Your Name will simply be a cute, rhyming slogan.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team