Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

California Law Lets Minors Erase Ill-Advised Online Posts

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill into law last month that allows minors to delete Web posts they may regret later. The law that improves data privacy and security allows young people to ask social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter to remove or hide information or photos they previously shared on the Internet, the Los Angeles Times reported. California is the first state to pass approve such legislation to improve data privacy and security.

Sen. Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said the measure, which was being called the “eraser button” bill, is “a groundbreaking protection for our kids who often act impetuously with postings of ill-advised pictures or messages before they think through the consequences.” He added minors should be allowed to remove information online that could potentially affect their futures and careers.

Websites also have to offer clear instructions on how to remove old posts and inform users when they register for a site that they will be able to delete information if they wish.

Websites have until 2015 to comply with the law.

Questions and Exceptions

However, the law does not dictate specifically what content a minor can have removed from websites, PC World reported. It also does not include information on how a website would be punished if it did not remove the requested information in a timely manner.

Many popular social networking sites like Google, LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook are based in California, and will have to comply with the new law fairly quickly.

There are other limitations to the law. While minors will be able to take down a silly photo they posted on Facebook a year ago, if a friend tagged them in an equally embarrassing picture, there may be nothing they can do about it. The friend would have to remove the photo, making some of the content filtering out of the tagged person’s control, PC World reported.

Adults, too, seem to be out of luck, as the law does not include a provision allowing adults to take down embarrassing posts from their pasts.


Some have voiced opposition to the new law. The Center for Democracy & Technology, a nonprofit that promotes Internet freedom and accessibility, said while the bill had good intentions, the new law could confuse website operators.

“If the sites are unclear whether they are covered under the scope of the bill, the response could be to bar minors from the sites entirely,” said Emma Llanso, policy counsel for the Center for Democracy & Technology, according to the Times.

Opponents also say it would force web developers to create state-specific Internet privacy laws, developing a “patchwork of policies,” Southern California Public Radio reported.

Additional Provisions of the New Law

Under current state and federal law, websites were already required to inform users the information they share online will be collected. But the new law in California also prohibits websites from selling identifying information about minors to third parties and bans advertisers from marketing certain products to young consumers. These products include spray paint, tobacco, firearms, tattoos and lottery tickets, PC World reported.

“[T]his bill will help keep minors from being bombarded with advertisements for harmful products that are illegal for them to use, like alcohol, tobacco and guns,” Sen. Steinberg said in a statement. “I thank Gov. Brown for recognizing that these common sense protections will help our children as they navigate the online world.”

This post originally appeared on IDentity Theft 911.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team