Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

Why the Police Want You to Upgrade to iOS 7

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The economics of petty theft is an interesting chicken-and-egg game. That’s how New York City police officers recently ended up imploring consumers to download the new iPhone operating system, iOS 7. They want you to be the egg.

Last week, New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman was among leading law enforcement officials calling on consumers to install the new software because of its security features.

“While it is too early to tell if [the new operating system’s] Activation Lock will be a comprehensive solution to the epidemic of ‘Apple Picking’ crimes that have victimized iPhone and iPad owners around the world, we believe it is a step forward and strongly urge iPhone users to download iOS 7,” he said in a statement, also signed by San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón.

That sent police officers onto subway platforms to pass out fliers, urging the download of the new software.

“ATTENTION APPLE USERS!!!!” the printout said. “By downloading the new operating system, should your device be lost or stolen, it cannot be reprogrammed without an Apple ID and password,” and directed users to Apple’s website.

Some Twitter users memorialized the unusual event, but kudos to NYPD for the proactive strategy.

Smartphones Are the New Car Stereo

There aren’t enough cops to catch GPS and smartphone thieves, just as there weren’t enough cops to catch car stereo thieves in the 1980s. Instead, society and technology have to invent a way to make the stolen gadgets worthless. When criminals can’t fence stolen radios — say, radios that won’t work outside the cars they were installed in — they stop stealing them. Of course, they don’t stop right away. They only stop after the sales channel slowly tells them there is no market.

With car radios, the egg had to come before the chicken, but it’s not quite that simple. Consumers were asked to invest in car radios with new anti-theft technology without an immediate payoff. Many spent the money and still had their car windows busted while criminals figured out what happened. But eventually, enough car radios lost their street value that radio theft plummeted.

And so it must be with smartphones. With iOS 7, Apple has added a great feature to its new iPhone operating system that has the potential to render stolen phones useless. It’s called “Activation Lock,” and the principle is simple. For some time, users have been able to use the iPhone’s “Find My iPhone” feature to track stolen phones, but it was deeply flawed. Criminals could easily turn the service off. Apple’s new OS requires the username and password to disable the feature, meaning the vast majority of criminals who go Apple picking will be carrying around a nifty thief location device if they turn it on.

Over time, criminals will begin to realize that stealing iPhones is a bad strategy. But they won’t know that their economy has changed right away, so they will continue “Apple picking” for some time.  When will the tide turn? When enough consumers download the new feature and implement it to reach critical mass, and word gets out to criminals that they better target Android phones only.

It Only Works if You Use It

The economics of this situation don’t neatly parallel the car stereo problem. Critically, Apple’s update is free. Consumers are not being asked to invest in a product that really only helps future generations of would-be theft victims, as they were in the 1980s. For a few minutes of their time, they can help end what some call a theft epidemic.

But economics is still holding back this plan — behavioral economics. Unless a decent majority of users voluntarily download the new operating system, criminals will still have the upper hand. Imagine 50% install it. Bad guys will simply steal twice as many iPhones to make up for what will only be an irritant in their industry. What’s the critical threshold? It’s hard to say, but you’d have to imagine north of 80%. Of course, users will eventually get the new OS when they upgrade their phones, but that could take several years. Law enforcement wants old phones (and iPads, and iPod Touch devices) updated now.

Because Apple users tend to love Apple products, 80% is not out of the question. One day after iOS 7 was released, 18% of users had downloaded it, according to online advertising firm Chikita.

But there’s another behavioral issue at play. Users have to turn on Find Me Now for Activation Lock to work.

As you recognize the behavioral barriers line up, you’ll understand why exasperated law enforcement officials, many part of the Secure our Smartphones initiative, ended up handing out fliers on subway platforms begging users to install perhaps history’s most sophisticated piece of consumer software.

Overcoming the Barriers

There are reasons NOT to install iOS 7. Some folks don’t like the new keyboard. There are claims that it impacts battery life. And most of all: if you’re like me, every software upgrade is terrifying, representing another opportunity for something to go wrong.

For that reason, it’s a shame Apple has taken a very good idea and held it hostage, forcing users to download an entire OS upgrade to take advantage of Activation Lock. A stand-alone update would be nice. And, as Schneiderman said in his letter, it would be nice for Apple for make the new feature opt-out, rather than opt-in, to beat the behavioral economics working against it. Until then, how about offering a free song or other freebie to users who turn it on? We all benefit from lower crime through price decreases and lower insurance premiums, but many people won’t take a step for the vague promise of fighting crime in the future.

Your move, Android makers.

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team