Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

Politics Aside, Is Obamacare Secure?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

It’s the biggest change in health care in nearly half a century, and perhaps unsurprisingly it’s already become a tool for scammers. Though open enrollment under the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) doesn’t begin until Oct. 1, scam artists – masquerading as government representatives — have tricked a number of consumers into coughing up personal information over the phone. That’s just the opening shot. Once millions of consumers begin providing unprecedented amounts of personal data to various health exchanges through countless state and federal networks, the real assault will begin.

Hackers of all stripes are licking their chops in anticipation of a treasure trove of high value information ripe for the picking. The burning question: Are the data conduits secure? And what’s at stake if your information is stolen? Best case: your financial well-being, if new accounts are opened in your name. Worst case:  your life, if medical treatment is obtained in your name and your medical files are co-mingled — leading to incorrect diagnosis and treatment. (If you’re worried that someone has fraudulently opened accounts in your name, you should request copies of your medical records and look for errors. You can also use a free tool like Credit.com’s Credit Report Card to monitor your credit for unexplained changes – which could stem from unpaid bills for fraudulently obtained healthcare. If something doesn’t seem right, you can dig deeper and get your three credit reports for free once a year.)

The politics of the Affordable Care Act are irrelevant. The issue for me is privacy and data security and whether you’re for Obamacare or against it, there are two ways the program’s rollout could put your personal information at risk:

A Potentially Insecure Data Collection Process

When it comes to keeping our information safe, the government appears to be playing a dangerous game of chicken.

An August report from the Inspector General revealed that the chief information officer for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, (which will run the data hub responsible for verifying applicants’ personally identifying information with various federal agencies including the IRS and the Social Security Administration), won’t sign off on data security until Sept. 30, one day before health insurance marketplaces are scheduled to open. That seems too close for comfort to me.

The Inspector General reported that such a tight deadline means the information chief “may not have a full assessment of system risks and security controls needed” to collect our data safely. Bottom line: The marketplaces are going live whether the data they gather is protected or not.

Optimists can take some comfort in the fact that, as CMS administrator Marilyn Tavener told Congress in July, the data hubs—the focus of much partisan huffing and puffing—are simply conduits. They are not databases, and will not retain any personal information.

Frankly, it’s not as though the institutions currently gathering our data do a bang-up job protecting privacy, either.

“I don’t want to say it will be better privacy-wise, but it can’t be any worse,” says my colleague Eduard Goodman, chief privacy officer of Identity Theft 911. “At least with a government program you will have some accountability.”

That said, there is absolutely no room for trial and error when dealing with information so vital to our health and valuable to those who would steal and exploit it for their personal gain.

Lack of Proper Screening and Training

The federal government spent $67 million to hire “navigators” to help people enroll in Obamacare. As Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told USA Today, navigators are needed to help consumers traverse the complicated world of private insurance, and dispel myths about the new program.

Many in the public and private sectors have expressed concern that navigators will have access to extremely sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers, without proper screening, training and oversight required to prevent data loss or theft.

In a letter sent to the HHS Secretary less than one month ago, 13 attorneys general warned, “As it now stands, it is inevitable that HHS’s vague ‘standards’ will result in improperly screened or inadequately trained personnel.”

The administration counters that strong privacy measures exist already. The final rule implementing the program requires navigator agencies to be pre-screened and closely monitored. It argues that navigators will receive up to 30 hours of initial training that includes preparation on privacy and security; will be tested before starting work; will not have access to applicants’ online accounts; and their work will be monitored by CMS.

The back and forth has continued, but the concerns expressed by congressional critics aren’t entirely unfounded. No matter how much training and oversight they receive, navigators will have access to lots information about lots of Americans, and it is not unlikely that some may steal that data for their own profit.

We can do better. As the ID Theft Resource Center points out, all navigator applicants should undergo criminal background and fingerprint checks. Georgia, Utah and Nevada enacted tougher requirements on navigator certification and licensure. As long as such efforts don’t devolve into obstructionism, states have broad power to protect Americans from fraud and, as the administration points out, should use that power.

Inevitably, some identity thieves will try to pose as navigators to scam consumers into handing over private information. Reports of scams have already surfaced. If you receive a call from anyone claiming to be a navigator, ask for their contact information, independently confirm their authenticity and then return the call. Search the CMS Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight to locate those organizations in your state that are serving as navigators.

The Affordable Care Act represents a huge step forward in our drive to give all Americans access to health care. Unfortunately, if we fail to properly secure health information and protect patient privacy, the door will be open to identity thieves, hackers and scam artists thereby creating an environment of distrust and insecurity which will ultimately jeopardize the health of the program.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team