Home > Identity Theft > Shocker: Teens Actually Do Care About Privacy

Comments 0 Comments

Kids frequently avoid or uninstall mobile phone apps they feel invade their privacy, and a majority of young women have disabled location tracking features out of privacy concerns, according to a new survey released by the Pew Internet & American Life Project.

The study found that teenage girls are nearly twice as likely as boys (59 percent to 37 percent) to say they’d disabled an app’s location features. It also found that half of all teens have avoided apps due to privacy concerns, and one-quarter had uninstalled an app over such concerns.

“Kids do care about privacy, just not the same way that (adults) do,” said Mary Madden, head researcher for the Pew study. “We see in all kinds of different research we’ve done, this assumption that (only) older adults care and are more careful about privacy is simply not true. It really depends very much on the specific context.”

One context where privacy seems to matter a lot to teenage girls: mobile apps that tell the world where they are.

“That does fall in line with a broader concern that relates to (girls’) sense of protecting their physical safety,” Madden said.  “There’s been a lot of messaging around stranger danger on the Net that is very much targeted towards girls.”

But more than one-third of boys also said they’d disabled location broadcasting. In addition to the danger factor, this might also indicate a more general willingness to tinker with settings among the younger crowd, Madden said.

“They aren’t as fearful as older users, who worry, ‘If I touch this, I’m going to mess something up.’ To turn off location tracking, you have to be willing to dig in and see what’s going on,” she said. “Teens are very sophisticated in managing their social privacy. In fact, that’s the work of being a teenager.”  In fact, kids often fight with parents over “privacy,” so their willingness to fine-tune apps shouldn’t be a surprise.

The Privacy Paradox?

Privacy researcher Larry Ponemon of the Ponemon Institute said he was surprised that 51 percent of kids would avoid privacy-invading apps, however. In a similar study his firm conducted earlier this year, 54 percent of respondents 18-24 years old said they would not download any “privacy-diminishing” app onto their phone, but manual inspection showed a true download rate of 81 percent.

“There appears to be a huge discrepancy between what people do versus what they say they do,” Ponemon said.

It’s unclear whether the discrepancy is the result of consumers not understanding how their apps work, or simply acting out the so-called privacy paradox, of saying one thing but doing another on privacy issues.

Madden said Pew’s research took this paradox into account, and many questions in the survey were specific enough to elicit accurate responses. She also said teens seem particularly good at following through on privacy-promoting behavior. Even though teens are not particularly concerned about government or advertising companies invading their privacy, they are extremely concerned about the social cost of oversharing online.

“For teens it’s not top of mind to think about abstract notions of privacy,” she said. “Teens are actually more concerned about, ‘Can I do the things I want to do without having information out there embarrassing me?'”

Red Tape Wrestling Tips

  • Know your apps. Apps do have to declare what location information they use. While it’s buried in fine print, it’s worth reviewing. Pay special attention after an app update. Sometimes, developers sneak in additional permissions with updates, so watch for that. If you aren’t sure why an app needs your location information, or its implementation feels sneaky to you, uninstall it. App developers should learn to be incredibly explicit about how they use this data, or made to face the consequences.
  • Icons can light the way. Some smartphones light up an icon to show location information is being transmitted. That’s helpful for uncovering apps that surprisingly share your information.
  • Not all or nothing.  There are legitimate uses for sharing mobile phone location data. Some apps can’t really function well without location data, such as maps, and that’s fine. In some cases, you might decide that the benefit outweighs the cost — you like seeing movie times near you, or weather reports without needing to update your ZIP code. The key is making conscious decisions that can be easily revised.
  • For parents. If you give your kids a cell phone, be sure they understand that plenty of apps — even innocuous apps, such as photo-sharing tools — will tell the world where they are, and that can be dangerous. Tell them about websites like PleaseRobMe or apps like Creepy, designed to scare people by revealing how a criminal can use such data against your child. That can serve as a good reality check.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team