Home > 2013 > Credit Cards

Should the Govt Be Allowed to Charge You a Credit Card Fee?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The big news in the credit card industry this year has been the settlement between credit card payment networks and retailers that has opened the door to merchants charging credit card surcharges. Although this agreement is largely meaningless in the ten states that currently prohibit these credit card surcharges, there are exceptions to these agreements and regulations. Case in point: in most states, government entities and public agencies have always been able to impose surcharges on credit card transactions.

The Law on Credit Card Surcharges

Perhaps you have seen surcharges imposed on credit card transactions at your state’s department of motor vehicles (DMV), or noticed that tax payments also have surcharges added by the companies authorized to collect them. This is both perfectly legal and in compliance with credit card agreements. The State of California is one state that prohibits retailers from adding surcharges, but makes an exception for government agencies and public utilities.  Is this fair?

Like most controversies, there are two sides to this story. On one hand, the government could be accused of acting hypocritically by imposing surcharges on payments it collects while prohibiting them on payments to private companies. These surcharges increase the cost to drivers, taxpayers and anyone else who pays a fee for government services or receives regulated utilities.

On the other hand, we have a government of the people, and we can look at these charges as adding to our city, state, or federal budges. This allows governments to offer more services while reducing the tax burden on everyone.

A Question of Fairness

In my perfect world, every retailer would be like gas stations where the price displayed includes all taxes and fees. Few things aggravate me as much as walking into a retailer and seeing a small sign indicating that they will be tacking on extra fees for one thing or another. I am willing to accept taxes being calculated separately, but I think it reflects poorly on a company when it doesn’t include its costs in the price they advertise.  And with most companies, I can take my business elsewhere, an option not available when I need to pay my taxes or renew my vehicle registration.

I also realize that governments, like private industry, benefit tremendously by accepting credit cards. They are able to increase transaction speeds while reducing costs. For example, consider the labor and security costs needed to accept cash and checks at your local DMV. Even then, a certain percentage of checks will always bounce, and a certain amount of cash will inevitably go unaccounted for. And since businesses are aware of these costs, the vast majority choose to accept credit cards despite paying merchant fees.

So for smaller transactions, it is not a question of whether it is fair that governments can pass along merchant fees, but whether they actually should. For agencies that accept a high volume of low value transactions, they can probably save money by dropping surcharges and encouraging credit card payments. For higher value and less frequent transactions, like tax payments, I believe that governments still come out ahead on surcharges which are based on a percentage of the transaction.

What I would say to leaders in both to government and the credit card payment industry is to come up with some creative solutions. Imagine if the federal government was able to negotiate a way to accept tax payments using a credit card, but with a vastly reduced percentage of merchant fees, or even a simple flat fee per transaction. Perhaps card networks and issuers would be able to cut their costs by excluding tax payments from earning rewards. Governments would largely get out of the business of processing payments in the form of cash and checks, while the credit card networks would gain a tremendous new source of business.

By seeking innovative solutions to streamline government payments, the banks, the American people, and our governments can all save time and money through credit card payments.

This is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily reflect the views of the company.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team