Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

Are Identity Thieves Living It Up On Your Utilities?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Identity thieves may be living large—watching HBO, running the AC nonstop and taking long showers—all on your dime. Learn about utility fraud and how to protect yourself in this Q&A with Brett Montgomery, a fraud operations manager at IDentity Theft 911′s Resolution Center.

What is utility fraud and how does it affect consumers?

Utility fraud comes in several flavors. The most common involves the opening of a fraudulent account — for cable, electricity, water or gas — in a consumer’s name without their knowledge. One reason this type of fraud is so common is that it’s so easy. Very little information is needed to open a utility account — a name, phone number, and service address are usually enough, and in any case, the service address belongs to the criminal. It’s really much too simple.

Another reason utility fraud is so prevalent is that it takes a long time to discover. In most cases, there’s no way for the victim to know that an account has been opened in his or her name. The fraudulent account often is opened with another service provider in another city or state—and even after an account goes to collections for nonpayment, it can be months or years before a collection agency can track down the supposed account holder. By that time, the criminal is long gone.

What can consumers do to protect themselves against utility fraud?

This is a tough question because the crime itself is so easy to commit. In general, we give the same advice for utility fraud as for other forms of account fraud: Don’t expose your personal information, and watch your accounts and credit reports for anything suspicious. Shredding bills and other documents before you dispose of them is especially important. A lot of the information used in utility fraud is simply pulled from the victim’s trash.

But the truth is that while you can take measures to protect yourself, this crime cannot be prevented. We have had cases where consumers who regularly check their credit reports still had no idea that accounts had been opened and services rendered in their name. Why? Because the accounts aren’t reported until they reach collections — and even then, they have to find the consumer before they can report it.

Because so little information is required to open the account in the first place, connecting those dots can take a very long time. To make things worse, the criminals are using their own address as the service address, so collection notices go to the criminal, not the consumer. The result is that the victim remains in the dark.

What are the different types of utility fraud?

Cable accounts are actually the No. 1 type of utility fraud we see, followed by the opening of fraudulent household electricity and gas accounts. We see fraudulent accounts being opened with all the major cable providers — Dish, Comcast, DirectTV — and at this point, they know us well.

These cases can be tricky for consumers to resolve, because you really have to know the process. It can be hard for a consumer even to get to the right department. Dealing with the documentation and other requirements for getting the fraudulent account removed can be confusing and time-consuming for the average consumer.

One fact worth noting is that utility fraud hits about 15 percent of senior citizens.

How are these cases resolved?

Trying to clear it up is difficult. A consumer basically needs about twice as much information to clear their name as they would need to open an account in the first place. To do that, there are three documents that are essential from the point of view of the utility company:

  • A police report to show that the crime has been reported.
  • A sworn affidavit from the victim attesting to the facts in the case.
  • Proof of a current utility service with the dates of service.

Beyond that, the more documentation, the better. We recommend when notifying the utility company that you ask them, “What do you need?”

Most utility companies are satisfied to have the consumer complete the standard affidavit provided by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). But some utilities require that the consumer use their own form for the affidavit.

Are there other utility-related scams that people should know about?

The AARP has a solid list of utility scams that’s worth checking out. One common scam uses spoofing software to manipulate the information that appears via Caller ID to make it look like the call is coming from a utility company. When you answer, the caller tells you that your account is past due, then offers to have you take care of it right then and there — all you have to do is give them your credit or debit card information. Needless to say, if your bill really was unpaid, it will stay that way.

Image: Ingram Publishing

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team