Home > 2013 > Credit Cards

Capital One’s Quicksilver: The Future of Cash-Back Credit Cards?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 6 Comments

Put yourself in the shoes of a credit card issuer. First, you want to attract rewards credit card users, who tend to be big spenders with great credit. But to hook these big fish, you need some great bait. When it comes to airline and hotel rewards, the lures are usually outsourced to a third party, but with cash-back credit cards, you need to offer the highest rate of return possible and still make a profit.

So in response to this challenge, banks may be making cash-back rewards credit cards more complex so that they can offer rewards — in order to seize a piece of the market — without being so generous that they lose money. For example, some cash-back credit cards have offered bonus levels of cash back in categories that change each quarter, while others feature rewards that only pay out annually, requiring cardholders to have patience.

Perhaps the tide is about to turn. Capital One issued its new Quicksilver card Wednesday to replace its Capital One Cash card. The Cash card had offered 1% cash back each month, and another 0.5% back once a year. The new Quicksilver card offers a flat 1.5% cash back on all purchases, every month.

“When we talk with consumers, we hear over and over how dissatisfied they are with the complexities and catches of most cash rewards cards,” says Mike Wassmer, Executive Vice President of US Card at Capital One. “What we’ve found is that people want a card that offers rich cash back rewards without having to keep up with complicated categories and other restrictions.”

Although Capital One’s Quicksilver may offer a simpler way to earn rewards, this new product could also signal some other trends in cash-back credit cards. For instance:

Higher Rates of Return with No Annual Fee

Right now, many of the top cash-back cards have an annual fee, but only return 1% cash back on most purchases, outside of bonus categories. Quicksilver sets a new standard at 1.5% cash back on all purchases with no annual fee. Cardholders who are only earning just 1% cash back might reconsider the reward cards they use.

Cards with Different Fees for Different Credit Profiles

Capital One currently offers its Venture Rewards card and its VentureOne card. The products differ in the amount of rewards offered and the annual fee. However, the Quicksilver card is offered with no annual fee to those with “good” or “excellent” credit. At the same time, Capital One is also offering its nearly identical QuicksilverOne card with a $39 annual fee to those with “average” credit. As far as I know, these are the only cards currently being offered in this way.

Additionally, “If someone gets declined for Quicksilver, they will not be automatically considered for QuicksilverOne,” says Sukhi Sahni, spokesperson for Capital One. “If they are declined for Quicksilver, they can apply for the QuickSilverOne card.”

New Cards Cannibalizing Older Ones

One of the side effects of offering a new and improved product is that it can make existing products obsolete. Capital One seems to recognize this by withdrawing its Cash card, but customers may realize that some of its other products are now outdated as well. For example, Capital One continues to offer its VentureOne card, which has no annual fee and returns just 1.25% in value in the form of miles that can be used for travel rewards. Compare that to the new Quicksilver product that returns 1.5% cash back with no annual fee… well, there’s really no comparison.

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://debtblag.com/ Debt Blag

    Hm. Fidelity Amex? Is Priceline gone? Both were 2% w/o annual fees…

  • Pingback: CyberBuzzer - Plug Yourself! » Credit Cards for Sports Fans: A Closer Look()

  • Curtis4412

    Your New commercial…..”Every Damn Day”… Really? I didn’t know “crass” was the new standard in attracting financial customers.

  • Jim in Va Beach

    I am no prude, but the “every damn day” is not necessary. He could just as easily said “every darn day” or “every single day” and still made the point. It’s not like this spot is shown only at night when little ears are in bed. A total miss in my opinion.

  • 1independentvote

    I’m offended as well by the Capital one commercial and Samuel L. Jackson’s ‘every damn day’ comment. It is an indictment on the failure of the advertising executives to understand what is appropriate and what is not. It’s not that I have not heard that word but to put it on ABC’s family time is a new lowering of standards for our children. It is a crime in my state to use that word to a police officer. Is it not a crime to use it when children are listening? I’m disappointed at the advertising executives that allowed it and will close my capital one account.

  • Charles Gable

    Who cares what Samuel L said the card is now obsolete with the introduction of the Citi Double Cash card

    • jakolu

      Not completely, since Quicksilver has no foreign transaction fees, and Citi’s Double Cash charges 3%

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team