Home > 2013 > Credit Score

Why Isn’t My Mortgage on My Credit Report?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 5 Comments

A mortgage can provide a strong, positive reference on credit reports and boost your credit scores. But sometimes lenders refuse to report those payments. What do consumers do then? Our reader Omar wrote:

“When my wife and I went bankrupt two years ago our attorney failed to recommit to our mortgage lender. Our problem is that our lender will not report our current payments to the credit bureau. I do not want or cannot afford any new credit, I would like for our lender to report our current payments to them to the credit bureaus.”

Apparently, Omar did not “reaffirm” his mortgage after his bankruptcy and, as a result, the lender is not reporting any payment history after he filed. But this problem is probably not due to a failure on the part of his bankruptcy attorney; in fact, his attorney may be acting in his best interest. Instead, the lender may be using the credit reporting issue as leverage to get the borrower to give up valuable protection he gained by filing.

That’s because when consumers file Chapter 7 bankruptcy and wipe out most or all of their debts, their personal liability for the remaining debt on the home loan is discharged as well, unless they “reaffirm” the debt.

Bankrupt debtors who don’t reaffirm don’t automatically lose their home. They can continue to make their payments on their loans and stay in their homes as long as they remain current. When they pay off their loans, the lender’s lien against the property will be satisfied and they will own their homes free and clear.

The advantage of not reaffirming mortgages is that homeowners who can’t keep up with the payments in the future won’t be personally responsible for the remaining debt. In other words, they can walk away, if necessary. This is an important protection for the many homeowners who, when they file, have very little equity in their homes or remain underwater.

What does this have to do with whether the loan is reported after bankruptcy? While lenders claim that reporting payments to the credit reporting agencies may cause them to run afoul of bankruptcy laws, California bankruptcy attorney Cathy Moran believes that’s a smokescreen, and that lenders are just trying to get debtors to agree to liability for the debt: “There are two clubs they hold over debtors’ heads to get them to reaffirm: 1. We won’t report post bankruptcy payments if you don’t reaffirm, and 2. We won’t refinance your loan because you didn’t reaffirm it. I can’t find any logic or law that supports those (positions).”

Mortgage reaffirmations are not an issue in Chapter 13 cases, says Moran, because long-term obligations are not discharged.

Another problem facing consumers who file Chapter 7 bankruptcy and fail to reaffirm is the fact that some lenders will no longer send statements to those borrowers, and/or will suspend their access to online account management tools. Our reader Mary shared her experience:

“We filed bankruptcy and was discharged 4 years ago. I got to keep the house and my car. I signed a reaffirmation agreement for the car but never received one for the mortgage. My mortgage was sold shortly after and now the new company will not give me access to their website to make payments or even see anything having to do with my mortgage. I have asked for statements to be sent and they are not doing that along with not reporting any of my payments for 4 years … What can I do?”

This is not an isolated problem, according to Moran. Again, lenders generally say they are unable to report the debt without violating the discharge injunction, the provision in bankruptcy that prevents creditors from trying to collect a debt that has been discharged.

To get around this problem, Moran says that sometimes the borrower will “enter into a stipulation with the creditor agreeing that (sending statements) does not violate the automatic stay. Sometimes we send them a letter saying they want to receive statements. Absent that, the borrower may just have to write down the payment information and take responsibility for making the payment.” The latter approach can be especially problematic in situations where a borrower has an adjustable-rate mortgage and the terms change.

Going back to Omar’s original concern that he wants his mortgage to be reported, he may be better off forfeiting that credit reference in exchange for shielding him from the potential liability that reaffirming the debt would expose. While he doesn’t want to take on additional credit, it would be smart for him to get a secured credit card to help rebuild his credit instead.

Debtors experiencing this problem may also want to complain to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which Moran says may address this issue in the future by issuing guidance to lenders.

Image: Top Photo Group

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • SS

    We had to declare bankruptcy in 2009 as a result of a Ponzi scheme. We then (unsuccessfully) worked with the banks to do a loan mod. We finally gave up and did a short sale of our home in 2011. The bank listed that the debt was written off as part of the bankruptcy settlement two years prior. (The date of the mortgage settlement was correct, but they said the account was closed due to the bankruptcy, which is untrue)

    My question is this: Should I dispute it? What is better for my credit score? Had A+ credit before the Ponzi, and would like to get there again.

    • Josh Benton

      It depends what date they reported on your credit report. If the last reported date was in 2009 then let it fall off of you credit at the 7 year point. If you dispute and they update the record it can take additional years to fall off your credit. a foreclosure 4 years ago instead of 6 years ago isnt going to change your score that much but it will take two more years to drop off your credit report altogether which will have a bigger impact on your score for longer.

  • Eva Starr

    I’m in this exact situation – my chapter 7 is still pending and my mortgage account shows as closed. I’m not looking to swindle anyone. I just want to know my legal options. I know I can just walk away if needed, but am I allowed to sell my home if I don’t reaffirm? If so, do I have to sell it for market rate (paying the bank and keeping the profit), or can I sell it and just pocket the money? In other words, am I obligated to repay the entire loan? Thank you.

    • Jeanine Skowronski

      Hi, Eva,

      You may want to consult a consumer attorney to learn what your options here are.

      Thank you,


    • Magdamae

      I’m in the same situation as you. I was having trouble pay the mortgage in the past and the local local credit union that holds my mortgage was less than helpful and could care less. They suggested I short sale my home. Really! That would benefit them because, yes, you can walk away if you did not reaffirm the mortgage. Yes, you can sell the home, it is yours to do with what you wish—as long as you are up to date on your mortgage payments. We are waiting for the loan to value to improve and then sell. The amount above the mortgage is ours to keep. If you walk away (mind you every situation is different) you don’t owe anything, BUT it will show up on your credit file as a foreclosure, if and when it happens. If you owe less, a short sale might be a better way to go if you are concerned about your credit. Always seek the best advice from professionals, dare I say it, talk your mortgage company. Tell them what you want and see if they have any suggestions or counter offers. Just remember, they are not looking out for your best interest.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team