More Consumers Are Defaulting Again on Modified Mortgages

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

The federal government has been trying for several years to help consumers with underwater home loans to rectify these problems with a number of initiatives, but new research shows that a large number of those who have received such assistance are now falling behind on their bills once again.

Through the end of March, a large percentage of the consumers who received mortgage alterations through the federal Home Affordable Modification Program in the final six months of 2009 had redefaulted on those loans, according to new data from the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program’s report to Congress. In all, 46.1 percent of those who received such modifications in the third quarter of that year had redefaulted, and the same was true of 39.1 percent of those who did so in 2009’s final three months. Both rates were up from those observed in 2010.

However, despite this major problem for the program (which was designed to help more than 4 million consumers modify their home loans as a means of making them more affordable), only about 862,000 nationwide have been able to get their modifications made permanent, the report said. That number could continue falling, however, as long as redefault rates remain anywhere near their current levels. Since the program’s inception, some 312,000 borrowers who received permanent HAMP modifications have redefaulted on their mortgages.

Potentially more worrying for the federal government, though, is that there is almost no data on what is causing these redefaults to happen, because the U.S. Department of the Treasury does not require mortgage servicers to collect this data, the report said. As such, SIGTARP is recommending that more be done to develop an understanding of why and how these incidents take place, as the Treasury is already keeping tabs on what makes HAMP modifications successful. Various aspects of the program won’t expire until as late as 2020, and as such, getting a better handle on what makes its efforts both succeed and fail may be vital going forward.

HAMP and other federally-run mortgage relief programs have been criticized in the past for not doing enough to help as many consumers as they theoretically could, due in part to rather stringent qualification standards that many experts have said can lead to rejections for even the most troubled homeowners.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Jenny @ Frugal Guru Guide

    It seems to me that a program that merely extends the agony of someone who is going to default isn’t just useless, it’s downright counterproductive. Either people need to be in truly affordable loans or they need to default quickly rather than being dragged down for several more years. As it stands, the program is actually HURTING people by keeping them in an untenable situation longer.

  • Yve

    Getting consumers lower rates on their mortgages can be a big help if they take advantage of it. The 50 to 100 dollars a person gets monthly as a result of a lower payment on their mortgage should be budgeted even if it puts $50 more dollars in their pocket. The mortgage holder also has to have paying the mortgage as a high priority in their life to realize the savings.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on News & Advice may also be offered through product pages, and will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.