Home > 2013 > Credit Score

Do I Need a Credit Repair Agency?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 6 Comments

We recently received a question from a reader who is looking for advice on how to repair her credit and whether or not using a credit repair company to help is a good idea:

I am presently trying to repair my credit. I have been laid off three times in the past ten years and I have a lot of work to do. What is the best way to get my credit score up? Would it be better for me to pay a credit repair agency to do it for me?

Picking up the pieces and recovering from a financial setback isn’t easy, especially in situations where you’re hit with one financial curveball after another. Losing one job due to a layoff is stressful and financially debilitating enough — being laid off from three jobs would be nothing short of devastating. Understandably, it can also end up causing a great deal of credit damage along the way.

Hiring a credit repair company to help you repair your credit can be tempting. However, unless you truly understand what they do and how they do it, it’s not a strategy I’d recommend. For one, despite their promises to “erase bad credit,” there is no special insider technique that miraculously erases past credit problems. Plus, you can do everything a credit repair company will do — and you can do it for free, without forking out the $39 – $79 a month that many credit repair companies will charge.

What Credit Repair Companies Do

Under federal law, you have the right to dispute inaccurate information in your credit reports. When you hire a credit repair service, you agree to let the credit repair firm act on your behalf in the dispute process. The credit repair company then asks you to obtain all three of your credit reports so that they can go through them line by line and identify any negative information currently being reported. Once they’ve identified all of the negative items, they’ll begin systematically disputing every negative piece of information in your credit reports — whether it’s accurate or not.

By law, the credit reporting agencies have 30 days to open an investigation and resolve the dispute. The investigation process involves validating the item with the data furnisher (the creditor or entity that reported the item). If the data furnisher is unable to validate the accuracy of the item within the 30-day window, the credit reporting agency must delete the item entirely. This is what credit repair companies are aiming for by bombarding the credit reporting agencies with dispute letters.

Why This System Doesn’t Really Work

If credit repair agencies are successful in getting negative information removed, why wouldn’t it be a good idea? Besides the obvious (the information being accurate), there are two big reasons why disputing accurate negative information is a bad idea:

1. Flooding the credit reporting agencies with disputes against accurately reported negative information can backfire. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, if the credit bureau determines that a dispute is a blatant attempt to have negative but accurate information removed, your dispute can be flagged as “frivolous.” If this happens, the dispute won’t be investigated and can cause future disputes to be ignored.

2. If the credit reporting agencies are unable to validate the dispute within the 30-day investigation period and the item is deleted, it doesn’t mean it can’t end up back in your credit report later. Even if the credit repair agencies are successful in getting through the 30-day investigation crack, if the item is accurate and the creditor or data furnisher reports an update or re-reports the item to the credit reporting agencies — it’ll end up right back on your credit report.


Instead of paying a credit repair service to fix your credit, consider going the DIY route. For the price of a stamp and an envelope, you can save your money and file your disputes yourself. Start by ordering copies of your credit reports. You’re entitled to one free credit report from each of the three major credit reporting agencies each year. You can also monitor your credit score for free once a month using Credit.com’s Credit Report Card.

If you find that there is any inaccurate information being reported in your credit report, file a dispute to have it corrected. Because your credit reports and credit scores are only as accurate as the information being reported, this is an important first step to improving your credit.

For more in-depth information on rebuilding your credit and improving your credit scores, Credit.com offers a consumer library of helpful resources including:

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Danny Bartko

    Deanna, in your personal experience, how often have you had to dispute with credit bureaus?

  • Deanna Templeton

    Believe it or not, Danny, I’ve filed enough of them to know I get better results going the old fashioned route rather than the online dispute process through the bureaus. Having worked in the consumer credit industry for the last 15 years, I’ve had my share of helping friends, relatives and coworkers who’ve had to deal with the bureaus (who are not always the most helpful folks) and the dispute process. And yes, I’ve even had my own errors to dispute due to the almost identical name of a parent who filed bankruptcy back when I was 19 years old. Based on your question and your email address, I’d take a guess that you’ve probably handled many more disputes than I have. The disputes I’ve helped with have always been legitimate errors so my results may be different than those where the dispute is to remove accurate (but negative) information. I appreciate your question and the point you’re trying to make, it’s a valid one for sure. In fact, I’d actually be interested in speaking with you about your business if you’re willing. I’d be curious to hear your perspective, not so much on the operations side of the credit repair industry, but more from a consumer cost and benefit standpoint. If you’re open to an interview, email creditexperts@credit.com and I’ll be in touch.

  • Denise

    Experian shows that I’m deceased because when I closed my Kohl’s charge card, the rep. accidentally marked me deceased instead of customer closed account. After I got that straightened out, I sent a notarized letter with a copy of my birth certificate to Experian stating that I am alive and Kohl’s made an error when I closed my account.
    This was months ago and I am still marked deceased. What can or should I do?

    • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

      Unfortunately, you’re not alone in having a problem getting yourself declared alive. We wrote about it here: My Credit Report Thinks I’m Dead

    • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

      We’ve sent you an email

    • http://www.credit.com/ Credit.com Credit Experts

      Denise —
      Experian is trying to get in touch with you via email . . . could an email filter be getting in the way? It might be worth checking your spam folder.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team