Home > 2013 > Identity Theft

Credit Cards Still Weapon of Choice for Fraudsters

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

Identity theft can hit consumers in a number of ways, but when it comes to cases of reported fraud, it seems that criminals are now relying far more often on payments made with credit cards than other methods.

Credit cards were used in nearly 56 percent of all fraudulent transactions conducted in 2011, the most recent year for which data was available, according to the third survey on Consumer Fraud in the United States from the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Economics. In all, of the 36.2 million fraudulent incidents reported to the agency in 2011, 20.2 million involved credit card payments. The next-closest payment type was related to consumers’ checking accounts, either as a result of the fraudsters taking money directly out of an account, or using a debit card. However, there were just 5.4 million cases of this type of fraud, accounting for less than 15 percent of all reported cases.

More troubling for borrowers, though, is just how common credit card fraud is becoming, the report said. A similar report from 2005 found that fewer than four in 10 instances of fraud involved payments made with credit cards, while closer to 30 involved checking or debit accounts. This indicates that a major shift has taken place in the six years between the two studies, and only fraud related to money orders and telephone accounts have seen increased activity, and those make up relatively small proportions of all reported cases.

The age group most likely to be affected by any type of fraud was those between 45 and 54 years old, as they accounted for 14.3 percent of all victims, the report said. Meanwhile, the second-largest group of victims was those between 35 and 44 years old, making up 12.1 percent of reported incidents. Interestingly, those 65 and up accounted for 13.8 percent combined of total victims (7.3 percent for people 65 to 74 years old, and 6.5 percent for those 75 and older), despite the fact that it’s commonly believed that older Americans are more at risk for identity theft and other types of fraud.

With incidents of fraud rising overall, it is becoming more vital for consumers to keep close eyes on their accounts, checking statements and bills as frequently as possible to check for unauthorized transactions.

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://frugalguruguide.com/articles/ Jenny @ Frugal Guru Guide

    We has a fraudulent charge on a credit card recently. We’re not sure if it was just a mistake or whether we had the stupidest scammers in the history of the world try to use our CC number because it was for Direct TV installation. Nothing subtle about that–you’d think if someone were trying to steal our info, they’d do it in a way that they weren’t revealing where they live.

    We got it sorted out, but that was the first and last charge on that account, so we are still wondering if it wasn’t just an honest mix up somewhere.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team