Home > Mortgages > The Mortgage Rule Battle on Capitol Hill

Comments 0 Comments

The Mortgage Rule Battle on Capitol HillThere has been a lot of change in mortgage rules in the last few years, many of which were designed to better protect consumers from predatory or problematic lending practices, and now those protective measures seem to be becoming points of contention.

Two regulatory changes to the ways in which mortgages are handled, one which already happened and another that seems at least a few months away, are at the center of a political controversy in Washington, D.C., according to a report from the Capitol Hill news site Politico. The first is a rule put into effect by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau earlier this year which mandates a number of ways in which lenders have to verify that a person can afford a loan for which they are applying to have it count as a “qualified mortgage.” The point of the rule is to both make sure that lenders do not begin granting unsafe mortgages as they did prior to the recent recession, but also to give banks a better chance of avoiding the losses that typically come with loans that slip into default.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Free Credit Check & MonitoringThe other regulation, which is expected to be put forward around midyear by a number of regulatory bodies, including the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., involves the ways in which lenders are allowed to sell packages of mortgages to investors, the report said. This is because while the CFPB has defined its own “qualified mortgage” rules, the other regulatory bodies have not defined what constitutes a “qualified residential mortgage,” meaning that there may be some ambiguity and even confusion about the process.

Some experts have advocated that the rules for QRMs should just mirror those for QMs, which would help to clarify the entire process, the report said. If one regulatory agency holds mortgages to one standard, and others to another, that could make the market significantly more complex not only for lenders, but for borrowers as well, as any discrepancy would likely lead mortgage issuers to simply comply with whichever was more stringent. That, in turn, could make it more difficult for would-be borrowers to obtain home loans.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

Currently, many experts say that it’s already difficult for consumers to get mortgages because lending remains particularly tight for this type of credit, even as it has broadened significantly for most other types of credit in the last few years.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team