Home > 2013 > Mortgages > The Mortgage Rule Battle on Capitol Hill

The Mortgage Rule Battle on Capitol Hill

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

The Mortgage Rule Battle on Capitol HillThere has been a lot of change in mortgage rules in the last few years, many of which were designed to better protect consumers from predatory or problematic lending practices, and now those protective measures seem to be becoming points of contention.

Two regulatory changes to the ways in which mortgages are handled, one which already happened and another that seems at least a few months away, are at the center of a political controversy in Washington, D.C., according to a report from the Capitol Hill news site Politico. The first is a rule put into effect by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau earlier this year which mandates a number of ways in which lenders have to verify that a person can afford a loan for which they are applying to have it count as a “qualified mortgage.” The point of the rule is to both make sure that lenders do not begin granting unsafe mortgages as they did prior to the recent recession, but also to give banks a better chance of avoiding the losses that typically come with loans that slip into default.

[Credit Score Tool: Get your free credit score and report card from Credit.com]

Free Credit Check & MonitoringThe other regulation, which is expected to be put forward around midyear by a number of regulatory bodies, including the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., involves the ways in which lenders are allowed to sell packages of mortgages to investors, the report said. This is because while the CFPB has defined its own “qualified mortgage” rules, the other regulatory bodies have not defined what constitutes a “qualified residential mortgage,” meaning that there may be some ambiguity and even confusion about the process.

Some experts have advocated that the rules for QRMs should just mirror those for QMs, which would help to clarify the entire process, the report said. If one regulatory agency holds mortgages to one standard, and others to another, that could make the market significantly more complex not only for lenders, but for borrowers as well, as any discrepancy would likely lead mortgage issuers to simply comply with whichever was more stringent. That, in turn, could make it more difficult for would-be borrowers to obtain home loans.

[Featured Products: Research and Compare Mortgage Rates at Credit.com]

Currently, many experts say that it’s already difficult for consumers to get mortgages because lending remains particularly tight for this type of credit, even as it has broadened significantly for most other types of credit in the last few years.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.