Home > Credit Score > Is VantageScore’s New Score Range Good for Consumers?

Comments 0 Comments

Last week, VantageScore, the 7-year-old credit scoring company owned by the three major nationwide consumer credit reporting agencies (CRAs) — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — took a big step in the direction of making credit scores easier for consumers to understand, as it abandoned the score range of 501-990 it has used since inception. With its new 3.0 model, VantageScore has adopted the range of 300-850, making it consistent with the score range long held by FICO scores.

While clearly a step toward making credit scores easier to understand, plenty of opportunity for confusion still remains when it comes to sorting out the various credit scores. A primary point of confusion lies in the fact that you have more than one. Some credit scores are used by lenders, and some, referred to as “educational” scores, are sold or given to consumers to be used as an indicator of creditworthiness.

To illustrate why a new VantageScore range may be confusing, imagine the merging of Fahrenheit and Celsius as temperature measurements. At face value it might seem that a single measurement system would be simpler for people to use, as the same language would be spoken when trying to describe hot and cold. But what if 80 degrees, as indicated on some thermometers, feels hotter than 80 degrees on other thermometers, due to different ways of calculating the temperature by the different thermometer makers?

This is where the aligning of score ranges between FICO and Vantage, though still a positive move, may fall just a bit short of a solution, as consumers will continue to be impacted by different scoring formulas that can be expected to produce different scores. The only difference resulting from this change is that the various scores will fall within a closer overall range than before, and consumers will still need to be aware of which scores are being used to evaluate their creditworthiness, as some will matter more than others to a lender.

As an example of how these multiple scores arise, when applying for a mortgage it’s common to have a different FICO score at each of the three CRAs, though each uses the same score range of 300-850. The same also goes for VantageScores when scoring credit reports at the three CRAs, whether using their old range of 501-990 or the new range of 300-850. Differences in credit reports and scoring formulas will almost always result in score variations of some sort — regardless of the score ranges being used — with, of course, some differences being more critical than others.

In essence, whether FICO and VantageScore use the same or different score ranges, consumers can still expect to have at least six different scores between FICO and Vantage: three FICOs and three Vantage scores. The only difference is that soon a consumer’s Vantage Score will be numerically closer to her FICO scores than before.

Another way to look at VantageScore’s adoption of the 300-850 score range is that a consumer no longer has to compare, for example, a VantageScore of 900 with a FICO score of 750, and wonder which one is “the right one.” Soon she will be able to compare an 800 VantageScore with a 750 FICO score… and still wonder which one is “the right one.” The bottom line is that the foundations of building and maintaining good credit are what you should focus on, and not the scores themselves.

Image: iStockphoto

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team